Subject company
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Forward Deployed Data Scientist, Lead · Lead · New York, NY
Take the offer seriously and negotiate from strength on equity, not base. The $215,000 base is effectively maxed within the public market anchor — negotiation energy belongs on increasing the RSU grant and securing a refresh cadence commitment, using Palantir's exceptional growth profile and the stock's current drawdown as dual leverage.
Palantir Technologies Inc.: Solid trajectory (71/100) — Rule of 40 140, stock -16% over 12 months, base at ceiling, equity is the only lever worth pulling.
Offer vesting schedule
Data Scientists · Palantir Technologies Inc. · New York
This offer’s base sits at the 100th percentile — above nearly every certified filing in this band.
Your base: $215,000 · $55,000 above the P75 mark — this band is a floor under you, not a ceiling
Source: DOL OFLC LCA disclosure data · n=21 certified filings · base cash only (excludes equity and bonus). Use as a citable market floor, not total compensation.
Only 21 certified LCA wage rows matched — treat the band as directional.
The negotiation room this brief is built to unlock — typically many multiples of its price. The lever-by-lever play is in the negotiation playbook below.
Solid
company trajectory · high confidence
5-year expected total comp (probability-weighted NPV)
What moves this number
Discount rate: 10%
Vesting over 4 years with 1-year cliff
Bear equity multiple: 0.4x
Base equity multiple: 1.5x
Bull equity multiple: 3.8x
Exit probabilities: bear 20%, base 50%, bull 30%
What to do next
Start here. This section compresses the brief into the decision, the strongest reasons behind it, and the risks that deserve verification before you sign.
Why the verdict landed here
Base $215,000 sits at the 100th percentile of the base-cash market band (median $143,000).
Company operating quality is strong (Rule of 40: 139.8).
What to verify before signing
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Signals we only see when the data is connected
CEO's public headcount reduction target directly undermines the five-year forecast's base case and makes the RSU cliff timing a structural risk
highRisks + Career upside + Company quality · medium confidence · 2 source facts in the appendix
49 insider sells and zero buys over 90 days contradict the negotiation case for a standard 4-year RSU vest — insiders are pricing in downside that the offer letter ignores
highNegotiation leverage + Leadership and stability + Questions to ask · medium confidence · 2 source facts in the appendix
The $0 employer 401(k) match, set against a 51.7% annualized stock volatility and a -38.8% current drawdown, means the total compensation package is more equity-fragile than the $555,000 headline implies — the risk section's pre-mortem scenario is the expected case, not the tail
highOffer economics + Negotiation leverage + Risks · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
Palantir's $631M in DoD obligations and $12.46M lobbying spend create a government-contract dependency that the five-year forecast's bear case underweights — if a named contract is protested or cancelled, the Forward Deployed role may be eliminated before the first RSU cliff vests
highCompany quality + Career upside + Risks · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
Unlock 3 more signals only Footnote connects
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiersScore components
Bar color: strong (65+) · moderate (45–64) · weak (<45)
Higher is healthier on every bar — including Red flags, where a high score means few were raised
Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiersThe decision rule
Accept-leaningDerived from this brief’s own numbers — the band placement, company operating quality, and role exposure — not model judgment. The same rule fixes the verdict above.
- Comp is already placed above market — protect it; negotiate scope, level, or refresh terms instead of base.
- The equity-weighted package (base plus equity plus signing) stays ≥ 1.5× the base-cash median (currently 3.9×).
- Equity is the swing factor — confirm the refresh policy and vest mechanics before relying on the headline number.
- Verification surfaces a dealbreaker (the verification questions in the negotiation playbook) — scope, level, or team stability materially worse than represented.
Alumni outcomes require optional user-contributed career data and confidence thresholds.
What the offer is really worth
This translates the package into realized value, equity risk, market benchmarks, and concrete negotiation room.
base plus equity plus signing
Market consensus
A compact read on whether public-market expectations support the equity story behind the offer.
DA Davidson: maintain
Jul 17, 2026 · Buy → Buy
DA Davidson: upgrade
Jul 02, 2026 · Neutral → Buy
Wolfe Research: upgrade
Jun 16, 2026 · Underperform → Peer Perform
Wedbush: maintain
Jun 05, 2026 · Outperform → Outperform
The $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA band for this role at Palantir (n=21, median $143,000) and well above the BLS OEWS New York state median of $130,460 for Data Scientists — base is effectively maxed within the public market anchor, so negotiation energy belongs entirely on equity: the RSU grant of $300,000 over 4 years prices in at $126.83/share against an analyst consensus target of $174.14 (median) and a bear-case scenario of $221,777 at $93.76, meaning the bull/base upside spread is 86.6% but the stock carries 51.7% annualized volatility and a -38.8% current drawdown from peak. The strongest negotiation angle is a larger initial RSU grant or an accelerated cliff (6 months instead of 12), grounded in the fact that PLTR's U.S. business grew 104% YoY, Rule of 40 scored 139.8, and the company is actively investing in technical hiring per Q1 2026 earnings — your leverage is the scarcity of forward-deployed talent who can operate at the intersection of AI platform deployment and enterprise client delivery, not the base number. Equity scenarios use rsu linear and show 86.6% spread across available public valuation anchors.
Evidence confidence: medium
Discarded implausible valuation anchor (DCF fair value) — more than 10× away from the current share price.
Base Is Maxed; Push Equity Hard: Your $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA market band for this role in New York (median $143,000, n=21), meaning Palantir has already stretched cash compensation to its ceiling. The negotiation upside is entirely in equity: the $300,000 RSU grant at current price ($126.83) prices in a -38.8% drawdown from peak, and the analyst consensus target of $174.14 implies 37% upside from here — a base-case RSU value of ~$412,000 versus the $300,000 grant-date figure. Ask for a grant sized to $400,000–$425,000 at current price to reflect where the stock trades relative to consensus, not where it has been.
Evidence confidence: medium
Stock Volatility Demands a Larger Grant: PLTR carries annualized volatility of 51.7% and a max drawdown of -48.2% — the stock is currently sitting -38.8% off its high. RSUs granted at a depressed price are not a gift; they are a risk transfer to you. The bear-case equity scenario values your $300,000 grant at only $221,777 (at the analyst low target of $93.76), a 26% haircut from grant-date face value. A standard risk-adjusted ask: request either a 30–40% larger grant ($390,000–$420,000) or a performance-based refresh trigger tied to 12-month revenue milestones, which Palantir's 84.7% YoY revenue growth makes credible.
Evidence confidence: medium
Palantir's 401(k) Match Is Zero — Recover It Elsewhere: DOL Form 5500 filings for plan year 2024 show $0 in employer contributions to the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN against $54.8M in employee deferrals — Palantir does not match 401(k) contributions. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% employer match would be worth $8,600 per year, or roughly $34,400 over a four-year vest cycle. This is a documented gap in total compensation. Use it to justify a higher signing bonus (current offer: $40,000) or an accelerated first-year RSU tranche, framing it as parity with market-standard benefits packages.
Evidence confidence: medium
Per the 2026 DEF 14A proxy, CFO David Glazer received $27.97M total in 2025 (salary $450K, stock awards $21.17M, option awards $6.31M), while CEO Alexander Karp drew $8.62M total on a $1.10M base — both packages are equity-heavy, with base salaries deliberately suppressed relative to total comp, a structural pattern that extends to the Forward Deployed ranks. SBC-to-revenue TTM runs at 14.0%, confirming equity remains the primary compensation mechanism across the organization.
From proxy-statement compensation records.
The 90-day insider window shows 49 open-market sells and zero open-market buys (high-confidence classification), with CTO Shyam Sankar executing an option-exercise-sell of 35,000 shares and Director Alexander Moore flagged as an opportunistic seller — both classified negative by the signal engine. licensed market data raw data for Q3 2026 shows 236,000 shares disposed across 7 transactions versus 35,000 acquired in 1 transaction (acquired/disposed ratio 0.14), a sustained distribution pattern that is consistent with insiders monetizing at current prices rather than adding exposure.
Pattern read derived from Form 4 filing data.
Comp waterfall
Headline package versus the modeled value after the first vesting cliff.
It separates advertised compensation from what is actually exposed to vesting timing.
Anchor negotiation around the gap between headline value and first-year realized value.
Equity scenarios
Discarded implausible valuation anchor (DCF fair value) — more than 10× away from the current share price.
Cliff risk: leave before the first vesting cliff and realized equity is $0 — the bear case is not the floor. Weigh signing cash accordingly.
Bear, base, and bull public-market anchors for the equity grant.
RSU value is not fixed. A strong offer can still carry material downside if the stock resets.
Ask for equity refresh protection, a higher grant, or signing cash if downside exposure is high.
Directional public-market anchors — not company-specific exec comp or your offer.
Palantir Technologies Inc. · n=21 · offer at 100th pct
- P10
- $120,000
- P25
- $128,000
- Median
- $143,000
- P75
- $160,000
- P90
- $185,000
Base cash only (year) — excludes equity and bonus.
Only 21 certified LCA wage rows matched — treat the band as directional.
BLS OEWS floor — Data Scientists, New York (state OEWS) (2025): median $130,460. Government survey median; a conservative floor, not the role-and-metro market the band above reflects.
Peer tickers are selected from public market data and filings — use as directional context, not a compensation survey.
Not available for this run: next earnings date. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
Growing — new sponsored-hire approvals rose in the latest complete fiscal year. Denial rate across the window: 2.5%. Still actively attesting: 112 certified LCA filings in FY2025 — the freshest read on sponsorship intent, ahead of the slower petition record.
Petition approvals from the federal record — counts of approvals, not people; one person can hold multiple petitions across years. LCA filings are attestations, not hires. A fiscal year marked “prelim.” is still being published by USCIS and is left out of the trend. Read the trend, not the absolute size.
This employer sponsors a 401(k) plan in the federal benefit-plan record. Headcount and the match below read from its retirement plan on file — PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN.
Audited DOL Form 5500 filings for FY2024, which lag the calendar by roughly one to two years. Counts are PLAN PARTICIPANTS — covered employees plus separated staff still holding a balance — not a headcount, and are read from the single representative retirement plan, never summed across a sponsor’s plans. Employer contributions are the plan’s Schedule H line 2a (the match); a blank contribution line means it was not disclosed at this grain, not that it was zero. The absence of a line is never the absence of the benefit.
Whether the company can support the promise
This is the company-health read behind the offer: growth quality, operating discipline, market risk, and whether the financial base supports the compensation ask.
Revenue mix
Government Operating Segment
Commercial
Latest reported segmentation, period as filed · USD. Panels may cover different filing periods — do not total one against the other.
Where geographic revenue comes from
Geographic Concentration Risk
UNITED STATES
Rest Of World
Latest reported segmentation, period as filed · USD. Panels may cover different filing periods — do not total one against the other.
Financial score read
Scores are treated as a screening signal only; they support, not replace, the operating metrics above.
Recent events that change the read
3 AI Stocks Flying Under the Radar to Buy Before July Ends
Palantir Stock Is Down More Than 35% from Its Peak. Is It Finally a Buy?
Prediction: Palantir Stock Will Go Parabolic After Aug. 3. Here's Why
Source feeds are filtered to a short materiality read; the brief avoids raw news-feed dumps.
Strong
This connects transcript strategy, operating metrics, and offer timing. A coherent company story strengthens equity confidence; drift or mixed messaging shifts emphasis toward cash certainty and explicit role scope.
This is a strong offer by any objective measure: base of $215,000 sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL LCA band (median $143,000) for this role in New York, and the $555,000 headline package is 3.9× that median — though the band excludes equity and bonus, so the comparison is directional, not apples-to-apples. The equity component carries real upside risk: PLTR is down 16.4% over the trailing 12 months with annualized volatility of 51.7% and a max drawdown of -48.2%, and the bear-case RSU scenario at analyst low ($93.76) values the $300,000 grant at roughly $222,000 at vest — negotiate for a higher grant value or accelerated cliff to offset that spread. The business fundamentals are genuinely exceptional — 84.7% YoY revenue growth versus a peer-group median of 21.3%, Rule of 40 of 139.8, 55.1% FCF margin, and $8 billion in cash — so the platform risk here is stock price volatility, not company viability; use that distinction explicitly in any negotiation to push for a larger RSU tranche rather than base, which is already at ceiling.
Evidence confidence: medium
Rule of 40 score 140 — revenue growth 84.7% plus FCF margin 55.1%.
Evidence confidence: high
Annualized volatility 51.7%; max 12-month drawdown -48.2%; current drawdown -38.8%.
Evidence confidence: high
Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The strategic narrative shows a consistent focus on AI integration, value creation, and government contracts, with a strong emphasis on operational AI and enterprise autonomy in the latest quarter. However, some themes have evolved, indicating a shift in priorities.
Evidence confidence: high
Consistent themes across quarters: Value Creation, AI Integration, Enterprise Autonomy.
Evidence confidence: high
Themes that vanished without resolution: Customer Expansion, Focus on U.S. Government Support.
Evidence confidence: medium
Disappeared themes may indicate strategic pivot or de-prioritization.
Newly appeared themes: AI Transformation at C-suite Level, Operational AI, Transformational Work.
Evidence confidence: medium
The focus on AI and operational excellence suggests a growing demand for talent in these areas.
Evidence confidence: high
Reported lobbying spend of $12.46M across 52 LDA/SOPR filings (24 months). Primary issue codes: DEF (39), SCI (23), AVI (11), HCR (9), INT (6).
$631.54M in federal obligations across 21 USAspending awards (24 months). Largest agencies: Department of Defense ($631.54M).
In their own words
Verbatim from the latest earnings call — management’s stated risks and investment priorities, unedited.
“the appearance of software working is not software working.”
“there are certain things that are outside of our control.”
“we remain committed to investing in the product pipeline and the most elite technical talent.”
“the USDA awarded Palantir Technologies Inc. a contract of up to $300 million last month.”
Rule of 40
Growth plus margin clears the 40 line — the company is growing with discipline, not buying growth with weak margins. That strengthens the case for equity.
Revenue growth and free-cash-flow margin combined into an operating-quality score.
It gives a quick read on whether growth is disciplined or being bought with weak margins.
Use a strong score as support for a stronger equity or refresh ask.
Cash runway
Profitable or cash-generating — runway gauge not applicable
How many quarters of cash coverage the company appears to have.
Cash stress changes negotiation posture and role risk.
If runway is thin, prefer cash/signing certainty over back-loaded equity.
Revenue per employee
Revenue productivity per employee from company financial and headcount data.
High productivity supports premium compensation; weak productivity can foreshadow cost pressure.
Use strong productivity as support for a strategic-hire compensation argument.
Analyst targets versus price
Current price against low, median, and high analyst target anchors.
It frames whether the market already prices in most of the upside.
Use wide dispersion as a reason to derisk vesting or ask for more shares.
Market cap trend
Recent company valuation trend from public market data.
It contextualizes equity timing and whether the offer arrives after a run-up or reset.
Pair this with stock-risk metrics before accepting equity-heavy compensation.
What could make this role better or worse than it looks
This section turns leadership, insider, board, and market signals into career-risk context for the role you are considering — and carries the forward scenarios: the base case and the three forks this offer can take.
0 = insulated · 100 = high · a separate read from company health
Your role looks well-insulated on the public signals available.
Company revenue is up 97% across the available quarters, which lowers role exposure at the company level.
Public court records show this employer has pursued former employees over IP or non-compete matters. If you may later work in the same field, understand your restrictive covenants before signing. Open the dockets for the specifics.
filed 2 trade secret / IP cases as plaintiff; named as defendant in 4 trade secret / IP cases (most recent 2016-10-11).
filed 2 contract / non-compete cases as plaintiff (most recent 2025-10-30).
named as defendant in 2 employment civil rights cases (most recent 2024-07-31).
Dockets: case 1 · case 2 · case 3 · case 4 · case 5 · case 6
Litigation (public court records)
On file — see detail above
Wage enforcement (U.S. DOL WHD)
None in the record
Workplace safety (U.S. OSHA)
None in the record
DOL debarment
None in the record
Limitations
No Item 2.05 restructuring 8-Ks matched this employer in the lookback window.
No WARN notices matched (coverage is strongest in CA and NY).
No public ATS board is mapped for this employer, so hiring velocity is unavailable.
Segment-level revenue is rarely disclosed; the revenue signal uses the company total as a proxy.
Leadership graph (resolved): David Glazer — Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (since 2025-03-24); Stephen Andrew Cohen — Co-Founder, President, Secretary & Director; Ryan D. Taylor — Chief Revenue Officer & Chief Legal Officer; Shyam Sankar — Chief Technology Officer & Executive Vice President; Jeffrey Buckley — Chief Accounting Officer; Peter Andreas Thiel — Co-Founder & Chairman; Kevin Kawasaki — Head of Business Development; Alexander C. Karp — Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer & Director; Joseph Lonsdale — Co-Founder; David MacNaughton — President of Palantir Canada
Evidence confidence: medium
Overall insider sentiment: negative. 2 sustained seller(s), 0 buyer(s) (from 5 classified filings). The insider trading sentiment for PLTR is negative, with multiple insiders engaging in sustained selling patterns and opportunistic sales, indicating a lack of confidence in the company's future performance.
Evidence confidence: low — read the specifics as directional, not verified
Sentiment derived from 5 classified filings at report time — treat as directional, not a full insider record.
David Glazer promotion: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Evidence confidence: medium
Heather Planishek departure: Chief Accounting Officer
Evidence confidence: medium
David Glazer promotion: principal accounting officer
Evidence confidence: medium
7 directors in latest source-backed proxy extraction; 4 marked independent.
Evidence confidence: medium
Governance signals from the filings: no red flags — board refresh, director load, and independence all read within normal ranges.
Evidence confidence: medium
Eighteen months in, the user is watching their RSU grant — originally valued at $300,000 — sit at roughly $180,000 on paper after PLTR's multiple compressed from 55x EV/Sales toward something closer to 30x as the AI infrastructure spending cycle cooled and Palantir's U.S. commercial growth decelerated from its 104% YoY peak; simultaneously, Alex Karp's publicly stated headcount reduction target of ~3,600 employees (from 4,429) materialized as a Forward Deployed org restructuring that eliminated several Lead-level IC roles and collapsed team headcount, leaving the user managing a smaller client portfolio with less organizational support than the role promised at hire. The zero 401(k) match — a $8,600/year gap at a $215,000 base — compounded quietly over 18 months into a $12,900+ total retirement savings shortfall relative to peers at firms with standard 4% matches, and the accelerated vesting cliff the user failed to negotiate means the first tranche only just hit, locking them into a decision point where leaving forfeits the remaining $225,000 in unvested equity at a depressed price but staying means riding out a headcount freeze with no refresh grant in sight.
Evidence confidence: medium
Palantir's U.S. commercial net new customer additions drop below 50 in any single quarter (Q3 or Q4 FY2025 baseline was the growth engine cited on the Q1 2026 call) — a deceleration here directly shrinks the Forward Deployed pipeline and triggers org consolidation before headcount targets are…
Evidence confidence: medium
A Form 4 filing shows any C-suite executive (specifically Karp, Sankar, or Cohen) executing an open-market sell — not an option-exercise-sell — above $5M in a single transaction, which would signal insider conviction that the current price level is a ceiling rather than a trough and accelerate the…
Evidence confidence: medium
The $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL LCA base-cash market band for this role in New York (median $143,000, n=21), and the headline package of $555,000 — base plus $300,000 in RSUs plus $40,000 signing — is 3.9× that base-cash median, though that multiple is not comparable to a base-only band. Palantir's operating fundamentals reinforce the equity component: Rule of 40 of 139.8, 84.7% revenue growth year-over-year against a peer-group median of 21.3%, and a 55.1% FCF margin give the RSU grant real backing, while analyst consensus targets the stock at $174.14 versus the current $126.83, implying a base-case equity value of approximately $411,906 at vest. Negotiate from strength on equity refresh cadence and grant size — the stock is down 16.4% over 12 months and sits 38.8% off its peak, which is a legitimate ask to increase the initial RSU tranche to offset entry-point risk rather than to renegotiate base.
Evidence confidence: medium
Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
SEC leadership records alumni reference: 1 executive transitions; top buckets: departure (1).
Evidence confidence: medium
Three forks
The three ways this role can go from here — the downside path, the base case, and the upside. Each fork carries a signal of its own direction or says plainly that none was extracted; a fork never borrows the nearest available sentence.
Palantir's U.S. commercial net new customer additions drop below 50 in any single quarter (Q3 or Q4 FY2025 baseline was the growth engine cited on the Q1 2026 call) — a deceleration here directly shrinks the Forward Deployed pipeline and triggers org consolidation before headcount targets are…
The $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL LCA base-cash market band for this role in New York (median $1
A 'no' answer means the role's existence is contingent on a contract win; if that award slips or is protested, the position is eliminated before the first RSU cliff vests.
Leadership tape
Source-backed leadership facts are used conservatively; unresolved or sparse records are omitted from user-facing claims.
David Glazer
2025-03-24promotion: Principal Accounting Officer → Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
“Mr. Glazer will cease to be the principal accounting officer of the Company”
Heather Planishek
2025-02-25departure: Chief Accounting Officer → role
“following the resignation of Heather Planishek as Chief Accounting Officer”
David Glazer
2025-02-25promotion: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer → principal accounting officer
“assumed the responsibilities of principal accounting officer on an interim basis”
Coverage note
Insider intensity
Form 4 buy/sell activity summarized by month.
Heavy selling does not automatically mean distress, but it changes how much equity risk you should accept.
Use sustained selling as support for vest protection or more cash.
Institutional ownership
3,201 institutional holders (latest 13F)
How much of the float sits with institutions, and across how many holders.
Ownership mix can amplify volatility and market sensitivity.
Treat concentrated ownership as another reason to stress-test equity-heavy offers.
Not available for this run: dated C-suite tenure, board interlocks, and largest-holder position sizes. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
Employer durability versus peers
How this company's financial health reads against its public peers — every company scored on the identical rubric, from its own filings. This is a durability comparison, not a list of jobs you could take instead.
Financial health, one rubric
Every company below is scored by the same rule — Rule of 40, revenue growth, cash runway — from its own filings. No cross-company guessing.
Financial health on one rubric: PLTR scores 95; peers — AMD 92, CRM 85, ADBE 73, ASML 70; peer median 85.
Evidence confidence: medium
Financial-health axis only — leadership, career, and role factors are not honestly comparable across companies from public filings alone.
No user-contributed tenure aggregate has passed k-anonymity for this company yet.
Evidence confidence: low — read the specifics as directional, not verified
How to use the brief in the conversation
This is the action layer: the asks to prioritize, the scripts to use, the questions to ask, and the dealbreakers to monitor.
Your base is already at the ceiling of what the market data shows for this role in New York, so don't lead with base — lead with equity. Open by expressing genuine enthusiasm for the role and the business, then make one clean ask: you'd like to get the RSU grant to $360,000. Frame it around the stock's current price relative to where analysts see it going, and the real variability that comes with a four-year vest on a volatile stock. One ask, one number, collaborative close.
Your counter, lever by lever
The $215,000 base already sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA market band for this role in New York (median $143,000, p75 $160,000, n=21). There is almost no credible market argument for a material base increase — the target of $232,000 is a modest 8% push that can be raised if Palantir resists equity movement, but it should not be the opening ask. Hold it in reserve as a fallback if equity is immovable.
offer at/above market p90 — small base push, press equity & scope
The $300,000 RSU grant is priced at $126.83 per share — a stock sitting 38.8% below its peak with 51.7% annualized volatility. The analyst consensus price target of $174.14 implies 37% upside, which would bring the grant's realized value to approximately $411,906; the bear-case analyst target of $93.76 drops it to $221,777. Requesting $360,000 (the target) is a 20% increase that partially compensates for the risk transfer embedded in a four-year linear vest on a high-volatility stock. The floor is $300,000 — do not accept less than the current offer on this lever.
computed equity room
The current $40,000 signing bonus is the only component of this package not subject to stock-price risk. The target of $17,000 here is framed as an additional bridge — bringing total signing to $57,000 — justified by two concrete gaps: Palantir's DOL Form 5500 filings show $0 in employer 401(k) contributions for plan year 2024 (against $54.8M in employee deferrals), and the stock's current -38.8% drawdown from peak means year-one vested RSUs are worth less in real terms than the grant-date headline implies. Use this ask only if equity movement stalls.
one-time bridge sized to the base gap (use if they cannot move base)
The non-cash levers here are meaningful given the CEO's public comments in June 2026 about AI-driven headcount discipline and a long-term target below current staffing levels. Before signing, negotiate two things in writing: (1) an explicit annual RSU refresh commitment — the earnings call cited 85% YoY revenue growth and a raised full-year 2026 guidance midpoint of $7.656 billion, making a $75,000–$100,000 annual refresh credible — and (2) clarity on the Lead-level promotion path and what the scope of this role owns versus what gets absorbed by internal AI tooling. These cost Palantir nothing to commit to and protect you materially over a four-year horizon.
non-cash lever: leveling, scope, and equity-refresh cadence
Scripts
Written to be sent as they are. Edit any of them before you copy.
When they push back
“Your base is already above what we pay most people at this level.”
I hear you, and honestly I'm not pushing on base — I think the base is fair. The one thing I'm focused on is the equity grant. That's where I'd love to find some room.
“The $300,000 RSU grant is already very competitive for this role.”
I don't doubt that, and I'm not trying to be difficult about it. My concern is just that a four-year vest on a stock with real price variability means the actual value I walk away with could look very different from the headline. Getting to $360,000 is how I get comfortable with that risk. Is there any flexibility there?
“We don't have room to move on equity, but we could look at the signing bonus.”
I appreciate that — and actually, that works for me too. If we can add $17,000 to the signing, bringing it to $57,000 total, I think we have a deal. Part of what I'm accounting for is that there's no 401(k) match, so I want to make sure the upfront cash reflects the full picture.
“We can't move on compensation at all — this is our standard package for the level.”
I understand, and I want you to know I'm still very interested in the role. Can I ask — is there anything outside of the grant amount that has flexibility? An annual refresh commitment, or clarity on the promotion timeline? Those matter to me too, and they might be easier to work with internally.
“We need an answer soon — we have other candidates.”
I completely understand, and I'm not trying to slow this down. I'm genuinely ready to sign. The only thing standing between me and a yes is the equity number — $360,000 gets me there. If that's possible, I can give you an answer today.
“I've really valued this process and I have a lot of respect for what Palantir is building — if the package isn't able to move from where it is, I understand, and I'd ask that you keep me in mind if something changes down the road.”
Targets are computed from your offer and a 8% base / 20% equity negotiation-room estimate; anchored to the DOL LCA market band for New York, where your base sits at roughly the 100th percentile; They are derived deterministically, not written by the model.
Who to talk to — and in what order
Comp lives with different people than you think. Aim each ask at the person who can actually move it.
Owns the offer number and can move base / signing within a set band.
Your first channel. Make the case here: give them the market floor and one clear, specific ask. Stay warm — they're your messenger, not your obstacle.
Owns level, scope, and the business case for hiring you.
Your advocate. Loop them in for a level bump, equity, or when the recruiter says the band is fixed — they can request an exception the recruiter can't.
Sets the salary bands; rarely negotiates with you directly.
You almost never talk to them. But the hiring manager can push an out-of-band exception up to them — which is why winning the manager matters.
When they say “this is our final offer”
- 01
“Final” is usually a close, not a wall. Stay gracious, restate your value in one line, and make a single specific, justified ask — not a list.
- 02
If base is capped, trade levers: pivot to a signing bonus, an equity refresh, an accelerated first review, or a title/level adjustment.
- 03
Only invoke a deadline or competing interest if it's real. A bluff that gets called costs you leverage and goodwill.
- 04
Give them an easy yes: name the one thing that turns a maybe into a signature today.
“I really want to make this work — I’m ready to sign. The one thing that would let me say yes today is [specific ask]. Is there any room there?”
Base Is Maxed; Push Equity Hard
Your $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA market band for this role in New York (median $143,000, n=21), meaning Palantir has already stretched cash compensation to its ceiling. The negotiation upside is entirely in equity: the $300,000 RSU grant at current price ($126.83) prices in a -38.8% drawdown from peak, and the analyst consensus target of $174.14 implies 37% upside from here — a base-case RSU value of ~$412,000 versus the $300,000 grant-date figure. Ask for a grant sized to $400,000–$425,000 at current price to reflect where the stock trades relative to consensus, not where it has been.
Evidence anchor: COMP PLACEMENT (authoritative band); COMPUTED METRICS (equity scenario base=$411,906 at $174.14 analyst median target); stock price $126.83
Stock Volatility Demands a Larger Grant
PLTR carries annualized volatility of 51.7% and a max drawdown of -48.2% — the stock is currently sitting -38.8% off its high. RSUs granted at a depressed price are not a gift; they are a risk transfer to you. The bear-case equity scenario values your $300,000 grant at only $221,777 (at the analyst low target of $93.76), a 26% haircut from grant-date face value. A standard risk-adjusted ask: request either a 30–40% larger grant ($390,000–$420,000) or a performance-based refresh trigger tied to 12-month revenue milestones, which Palantir's 84.7% YoY revenue growth makes credible.
Evidence anchor: COMPUTED METRICS (annualized volatility 51.7%, max drawdown -48.2%, bear scenario $221,777 at $93.76, revenue growth 84.7% YoY)
Palantir's 401(k) Match Is Zero — Recover It Elsewhere
DOL Form 5500 filings for plan year 2024 show $0 in employer contributions to the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN against $54.8M in employee deferrals — Palantir does not match 401(k) contributions. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% employer match would be worth $8,600 per year, or roughly $34,400 over a four-year vest cycle. This is a documented gap in total compensation. Use it to justify a higher signing bonus (current offer: $40,000) or an accelerated first-year RSU tranche, framing it as parity with market-standard benefits packages.
Evidence anchor: DOL Form 5500, filing year 2024 (PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN); employer contributions $0
Revenue Growth Justifies Refresh Cadence Commitment
Palantir's Q1 2026 earnings call cited 85% YoY revenue growth, a Rule of 40 score of 145, and raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance midpoint to $7.656 billion — metrics that place it at 4× the peer-group median revenue growth rate of 21.3%. A company compounding at this rate will reprice equity aggressively at each refresh cycle. Negotiate an explicit annual refresh commitment (minimum $75,000–$100,000 in new RSUs per year) in writing before signing. Without a stated refresh policy, you are exposed to a four-year cliff structure on a single grant in a stock with 51.7% annualized volatility.
Evidence anchor: EARNINGS STRUCTURED (Q1 2026: revenue growth 85% YoY, Rule of 40 = 145, guidance raised to $7.656B midpoint); COMPUTED METRICS (peer-group median revenue growth 21.3%)
Insider Selling Pattern Warrants Accelerated Vesting
SEC Form 4 filings show 49 open-market insider sells versus 0 open-market buys in the trailing 90 days, classified as sustained selling with high confidence. CTO Shyam Sankar's recent transactions are classified as option-exercise-sell, and director Alexander Moore as opportunistic sell. Insiders with full information are reducing exposure at current prices. This is not a reason to decline the offer — the business fundamentals are strong — but it is a legitimate basis to request a 3-year vest schedule instead of 4, or a 25% first-year cliff instead of the standard 12-month cliff, reducing your exposure to a single price point on a volatile stock that insiders are actively trimming.
Evidence anchor: MATERIALIZED SIGNAL FACTS (insider sentiment: negative, 49 sells / 0 buys, sustained selling, high confidence); SEC Form 4 filings (Sankar: option_exercise_sell; Moore: opportunistic_sell)
Questions they cannot fake
- 1
The $300,000 RSU grant vests over four years, but PLTR is currently trading at $126.83 — down 38.8% from its peak and 16.4% over the last twelve months. The analyst consensus price target is $174.14, implying roughly 37% upside from here. Given that spread, what is the grant size denominated in shares, and is the company willing to set the share count based on a 30-day VWAP at grant date rather than the current spot price?
RSU grants priced at a depressed spot lock in fewer shares. If the stock recovers toward the $174.14 analyst median, a VWAP-based grant protects you from being under-equitized relative to the intended $300,000 notional. This is a standard ask at companies with elevated volatility — PLTR's annualized vol is 51.7% — and costs the company nothing if the stock stays flat.
- 2
The 10-K filed February 2026 shows Palantir's 401(k) plan had $0 in employer contributions against $54.8 million in employee deferrals for the 2024 plan year. Is there a company match, and if not, is there a path to negotiate additional cash compensation or a supplemental deferred comp arrangement to offset that gap?
A zero employer 401(k) match is a real total-comp haircut that rarely appears in offer letters. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% match would be worth $8,600 annually — roughly $34,000 over the four-year vest window. Surfacing this now gives you a clean, documented basis to request either a match commitment or a base adjustment before you sign.
- 3
CEO Karp stated publicly in June 2026 that Palantir intends to grow revenue while decreasing headcount through AI productivity gains, with a long-term staffing target meaningfully below the current 4,429 employees. How does that headcount discipline affect the Forward Deployed Data Scientist org specifically — is this role backfilling attrition, expanding a team, or part of a net-new initiative tied to a named product or contract?
Palantir's revenue per employee already hit $368,612, up 64.2% year-over-year. If the company is actively engineering headcount reduction via AI, understanding whether this seat is structural or discretionary determines your negotiating posture on scope, title, and the probability of the role existing in its current form at year two of your vest.
- 4
Insider Form 4 filings show 49 open-market sells and zero open-market buys over the last 90 days, including classified opportunistic sells by board member Alexander Moore and option-exercise-sells by CTO Shyam Sankar. What is the company's current equity refresh cadence for Lead-level individual contributors, and at what performance threshold does a refresh grant get triggered?
Sustained insider selling at this volume — with a disposed-to-acquired ratio of roughly 6.8-to-1 per the Q3 2026 licensed market data statistics — signals that insiders are not adding exposure at current prices. Before you accept $300,000 in RSUs priced at $126.83, you need to know whether refresh grants are annual, performance-gated, or discretionary, and what the historical refresh size looks like at your level. This directly affects your four-year realized equity outcome.
Dealbreakers to watch
Sustained Insider Selling With Zero Open-Market Buys
highSEC Form 4 filings show 49 open-market sells and 0 open-market buys over the trailing 90 days, with 236,000 shares disposed versus 35,000 acquired (an acquired/disposed ratio of 0.14). Classified signals flag Shyam Sankar (CTO) executing option-exercise-sells and board member Alexander Moore in an opportunistic-sell pattern. At a $126.83 stock price already sitting 38.8% below its peak and 16.4% down over 12 months, this is the single most actionable risk to your $300,000 RSU grant. The bear-case equity scenario values that grant at $221,777 (at analyst low target of $93.76) versus $411,906 at the median analyst target of $174.14 — a $190,000 spread that hinges entirely on where the stock goes before your vest dates.
Source ↗ · SEC Form 4 filings (multiple, most recent 2026-07-17); FMP insider statistics Q3 2026 (CIK 0001321655); materialized insider_sentiment signalCEO Has Publicly Signaled a Hiring Freeze and Headcount Reduction Target
highAlex Karp stated in June 2026 that Palantir plans to largely freeze hiring and grow revenue while decreasing headcount via AI productivity gains, with a long-term target meaningfully below the current 4,429 employees (references to ~3,600 cited in coverage). The Q1 2026 earnings transcript confirms investment is concentrated in AI platform and technical hiring — a narrow category. A Forward Deployed Data Scientist role sits at the intersection of client-facing delivery and technical depth; if Palantir's internal AI tooling absorbs deployment work, the scope and headcount of this function are directly exposed. This is not a layoff signal — revenue grew 84.7% YoY and the company is net hiring — but the strategic direction creates real ambiguity about role longevity and promotion surface at the Lead level.
Source ↗ · Fortune, 2026-06-09 (Karp comments on hiring discipline and headcount targets); Q1 FY2026 earnings transcript (headcount_signals: hiring concentrated in AI platform and technical roles); PLTR 10-K filed 2026-02-17 (employee count 4,429 as of 2025-12-31)RSU Equity Is Priced Into an Extreme Valuation Multiple — Downside Is Asymmetric
mediumPLTR trades at 55.3x EV/Sales TTM, 123x EV/EBITDA, and 257x trailing P/E. The stock-based compensation to revenue ratio is 14.0% TTM, meaning a meaningful portion of your comp is funded by dilution at a multiple that prices in sustained hypergrowth. Annualized volatility is 51.7% and the max drawdown is -48.2%. Your $300,000 RSU grant at the grant-date price of $126.83 vests linearly over 4 years; if the stock mean-reverts toward the analyst low target of $93.76, year-1 vested equity is worth roughly $56,000 less than the headline implies. The base-case analyst consensus of $174.14 would produce $411,906 total equity value — but that requires the stock to recover 37% from current levels. The signing bonus of $40,000 is the only component of this package that is not subject to this risk, and it likely carries a clawback if you leave before the end of year 1.
Source ↗ · PLTR 10-K filed 2026-02-17 (SEC CIK 0001321655); computed metrics (EV/Sales 55.3x, annualized vol 51.7%, max drawdown -48.2%); analyst price target consensus (median $174.14, low $93.76)No Employer 401(k) Match on File — A Hidden Comp Gap at This Base Level
mediumDOL Form 5500 filings for plan year 2024 show $0 in employer contributions to the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN against $54.8M in employee deferrals across 2,778 active participants. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% employer match would be worth $8,600 per year — roughly $34,400 over the 4-year vest window. This is not confirmed as a permanent policy (Form 5500 data lags 1-2 years), but it is a concrete negotiation angle: if Palantir does not match, the effective total comp is lower than the headline $555,000 suggests relative to peers who do. Raise it explicitly in negotiation — either confirm the match exists and was not captured, or use the gap to justify a higher signing bonus or RSU grant.
Source: DOL Form 5500, PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN, filing year 2024 (employer contributions: $0; employee deferrals: $54.8M; active participants: 2,778)
Pre-mortem: what would make this offer fail
These are the brief’s highest-friction warnings converted into diligence prompts before you sign.
- 1
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Canonical action signals
Base Is Maxed; Push Equity Hard: Your $215,000 base sits at the 100th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA market band for this role in New York (median $143,000, n=21), meaning Palantir has already stretched cash compensation to its ceiling. The negotiation upside is entirely in equity: the $300,000 RSU grant at current price ($126.83) prices in a -38.8% drawdown from peak, and the analyst consensus target of $174.14 implies 37% upside from here — a base-case RSU value of ~$412,000 versus the $300,000 grant-date figure. Ask for a grant sized to $400,000–$425,000 at current price to reflect where the stock trades relative to consensus, not where it has been.
Evidence confidence: medium
Stock Volatility Demands a Larger Grant: PLTR carries annualized volatility of 51.7% and a max drawdown of -48.2% — the stock is currently sitting -38.8% off its high. RSUs granted at a depressed price are not a gift; they are a risk transfer to you. The bear-case equity scenario values your $300,000 grant at only $221,777 (at the analyst low target of $93.76), a 26% haircut from grant-date face value. A standard risk-adjusted ask: request either a 30–40% larger grant ($390,000–$420,000) or a performance-based refresh trigger tied to 12-month revenue milestones, which Palantir's 84.7% YoY revenue growth makes credible.
Evidence confidence: medium
Palantir's 401(k) Match Is Zero — Recover It Elsewhere: DOL Form 5500 filings for plan year 2024 show $0 in employer contributions to the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES 401(K) PLAN against $54.8M in employee deferrals — Palantir does not match 401(k) contributions. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% employer match would be worth $8,600 per year, or roughly $34,400 over a four-year vest cycle. This is a documented gap in total compensation. Use it to justify a higher signing bonus (current offer: $40,000) or an accelerated first-year RSU tranche, framing it as parity with market-standard benefits packages.
Evidence confidence: medium
The $300,000 RSU grant vests over four years, but PLTR is currently trading at $126.83 — down 38.8% from its peak and 16.4% over the last twelve months. The analyst consensus price target is $174.14, implying roughly 37% upside from here. Given that spread, what is the grant size denominated in shares, and is the company willing to set the share count based on a 30-day VWAP at grant date rather than the current spot price? Why: RSU grants priced at a depressed spot lock in fewer shares. If the stock recovers toward the $174.14 analyst median, a VWAP-based grant protects you from being under-equitized relative to the intended $300,000 notional. This is a standard ask at companies with elevated volatility — PLTR's annualized vol is 51.7% — and costs the company nothing if the stock stays flat.
Evidence confidence: medium
The 10-K filed February 2026 shows Palantir's 401(k) plan had $0 in employer contributions against $54.8 million in employee deferrals for the 2024 plan year. Is there a company match, and if not, is there a path to negotiate additional cash compensation or a supplemental deferred comp arrangement to offset that gap? Why: A zero employer 401(k) match is a real total-comp haircut that rarely appears in offer letters. At a $215,000 base, a standard 4% match would be worth $8,600 annually — roughly $34,000 over the four-year vest window. Surfacing this now gives you a clean, documented basis to request either a match commitment or a base adjustment before you sign.
Evidence confidence: medium
CEO Karp stated publicly in June 2026 that Palantir intends to grow revenue while decreasing headcount through AI productivity gains, with a long-term staffing target meaningfully below the current 4,429 employees. How does that headcount discipline affect the Forward Deployed Data Scientist org specifically — is this role backfilling attrition, expanding a team, or part of a net-new initiative tied to a named product or contract? Why: Palantir's revenue per employee already hit $368,612, up 64.2% year-over-year. If the company is actively engineering headcount reduction via AI, understanding whether this seat is structural or discretionary determines your negotiating posture on scope, title, and the probability of the role existing in its current form at year two of your vest.
Evidence confidence: medium
Eighteen months in, the user is watching their RSU grant — originally valued at $300,000 — sit at roughly $180,000 on paper after PLTR's multiple compressed from 55x EV/Sales toward something closer to 30x as the AI infrastructure spending cycle cooled and Palantir's U.S. commercial growth decelerated from its 104% YoY peak; simultaneously, Alex Karp's publicly stated headcount reduction target of ~3,600 employees (from 4,429) materialized as a Forward Deployed org restructuring that eliminated several Lead-level IC roles and collapsed team headcount, leaving the user managing a smaller client portfolio with less organizational support than the role promised at hire. The zero 401(k) match — a $8,600/year gap at a $215,000 base — compounded quietly over 18 months into a $12,900+ total retirement savings shortfall relative to peers at firms with standard 4% matches, and the accelerated vesting cliff the user failed to negotiate means the first tranche only just hit, locking them into a decision point where leaving forfeits the remaining $225,000 in unvested equity at a depressed price but staying means riding out a headcount freeze with no refresh grant in sight.
Evidence confidence: medium
Palantir's U.S. commercial net new customer additions drop below 50 in any single quarter (Q3 or Q4 FY2025 baseline was the growth engine cited on the Q1 2026 call) — a deceleration here directly shrinks the Forward Deployed pipeline and triggers org consolidation before headcount targets are…
Evidence confidence: medium
A Form 4 filing shows any C-suite executive (specifically Karp, Sankar, or Cohen) executing an open-market sell — not an option-exercise-sell — above $5M in a single transaction, which would signal insider conviction that the current price level is a ceiling rather than a trough and accelerate the…
Evidence confidence: medium
Not available for this run: exit terms on the public record. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
What this brief covers — and what it can’t
Public-company evidence: financial health and trajectory, leadership and board signals, role-level exposure (restructuring filings, WARN notices), the citable market wage band, insider filing patterns, and the negotiation math built from them.
Your future manager and team, day-to-day culture, benefit terms the filings don’t carry (the 401k match formula, PTO, parental leave, healthcare costs), and private-company comparisons. Where a DOL Form 5500 filing matched, the plan-level 401k facts appear above — the day-to-day terms still don’t. That’s what the verification questions in §6 are for — ask them before you sign.
Evidence and methodology
The main brief stays readable; the supporting facts, confidence map, source logs, methodology, and export preview live here for auditability.
Confidence and data gaps
- Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Sources cross-referenced
Data coverage
This tracks whether available evidence is rendered, held for methodology, gated by confidence, or unavailable.
Canonical verdict and one-number model
Canonical
Rendered in the executive decision screen.
Canonical section claims
Canonical · 47 items
Rendered across the guided chapters as concise evidence cards.
Supporting facts and methodology notes
Canonical · 36 items
Kept in the appendix so the main report stays readable.
Revenue product and geographic segmentation
Fetched · 6 items
Top segments are rendered in Company Quality; full rows remain source data.
Analyst estimates, grades, DCF, targets, earnings
Fetched
Rendered as market-consensus cards instead of raw analyst feeds.
News, press releases, and M&A events
Fetched · 6 items
Material recent events are summarized; raw feed clutter is omitted from the main flow.
Ownership concentration and financial health scores
Fetched
Rendered in Role and Career Risk when it changes the risk read.
Career signal layer leadership and board coverage
Computed
Rendered as leadership tape, coverage note, and board count.
O*NET, BEA, WARN, SEC facts, lobbying, USAspending, FEC
Open Data · 5 items
Verified public-data facts are rendered through canonical claims and the evidence appendix.
Evidence behind the dossier: supporting facts, methodology, confidence rationale, filing logs, and exportable rows. Empty sections describe what was reviewed rather than silently disappearing.
Supporting facts(36)
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2024): $827.5M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2024
- Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2025): $883.9M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q1 FY2025
- Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2025): $1003.7M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q2 FY2025
- Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2025): $1181.1M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q3 FY2025
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $1406.8M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2025
- Rule of 40 score: 139.8. Revenue growth 84.7% + FCF margin 55.1%.Computed market metrics · high confidence · 2026-07-22T15:13:59.191Z
- Revenue per employee: $369K (+64.2% YoY).Computed market metrics · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T15:13:59.191Z
- Insider activity (90d): 49 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 21 equity awards, 0 tax-withholding, 0 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).Form 4 insider activity · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T15:16:23.188Z
- Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $411,906 for the supplied grant.Equity scenario model · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T15:13:59.191Z
- 12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 51.7%, max drawdown -48.2%, current drawdown -38.8%.Historical price model · high confidence · 2026-07-22T15:13:59.191Z
- David Glazer promotion: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2025-03-24https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt
- Heather Planishek departure: Chief Accounting Officer.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2025-02-25https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt
- David Glazer promotion: principal accounting officer.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2025-02-25https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt
- Board: 7 directors (4/7 independent).Proxy statement board record · medium confidence · 2026https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000019/pltr-20260423.htm
- SEC filing: 4 filed 2026-07-17 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-17 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000018/xslF345X06/wk-form4_1784333024.xml
- SEC filing: 4 filed 2026-07-07 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-07 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182415926000009/xslF345X06/wk-form4_1783468921.xml
- SEC filing: SC 13G filed 2026-07-01 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-01 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165526000036/xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xml
- Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The focus on AI and operational excellence suggests a growing demand for talent in these areas.Earnings call transcript · high confidence · 2026-07-22T15:16:23.188Z
- Insider sentiment: negative. 2 sustained sellers, 0 buyers (from 5 classified filings). The insider trading sentiment for PLTR is negative, with multiple insiders engaging in sustained selling patterns and opportunistic sales, indicating a lack of confidence in the company's future…Insider activity classification · low confidence · 2026-07-22T15:16:23.188Z
- Lobbying exposure: $12.46M reported over 52 filings. Top issues: DEF, SCI, AVI, HCR, INT.Public lobbying disclosure · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T15:16:23.188Z
Confidence map(8)
- comp_reality · medium Discarded implausible valuation anchor (DCF fair value) — more than 10× away from the current share price.
- leverage · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- leadership_stability · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- three_questions · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- counterfactual · low Counterfactual recommender needs alumni outcomes and peer score generation.
- five_year_forecast · low Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- organizational_diagnosis · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- red_flags · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
Methodology(10)
- Trajectory Score weights organizational health, leadership stability, strategic coherence, alumni outcomes, promotion velocity, skills marketability, and role-specific risk.
- One Number model varies by report mode: NPV for offer evaluation, EV delta for stay-or-go, trajectory percentile for job seekers, CCVI for career trajectory.
- Public-source leadership signals come from SEC 8-K and DEF 14A records when available.
- Leadership coverage: ready. Leadership=ready, board=ready, transitions=ready. 12 role records, 7 board records, 3 transition records.
- Ticker: PLTR. Company: Palantir Technologies Inc..
- Offer inputs: base $215,000, equity $300,000.
- No user-contributed tenure aggregates available.
- Cross-section findings are AI-generated from assembled Tier 2 data and validated for multi-section citation.
- Pre-mortem output was generated by Footnote's structured risk model.
- Insider sentiment aggregate: negative (2 sustained sellers, 0 buyers).
8-K leadership log(3)
[
{
"new_role": "Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt",
"former_role": "Principal Accounting Officer",
"person_name": "David Glazer",
"source_quote": "Mr. Glazer will cease to be the principal accounting officer of the Company",
"effective_date": "2025-03-24",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "promotion"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt",
"former_role": "Chief Accounting Officer",
"person_name": "Heather Planishek",
"source_quote": "following the resignation of Heather Planishek as Chief Accounting Officer",
"effective_date": "2025-02-25",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "departure"
},
{
"new_role": "principal accounting officer",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000132165525000033/0001321655-25-000033.txt",
"former_role": "Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer",
"person_name": "David Glazer",
"source_quote": "assumed the responsibilities of principal accounting officer on an interim basis",
"effective_date": "2025-02-25",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "promotion"
}
]Insider trading log(100)
[
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000018/0001823952-26-000018-index.htm",
"price": 133.7505,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1099295,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 11800,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000018/0001823952-26-000018-index.htm",
"price": 134.5549,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1096195,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 3100,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000018/0001823952-26-000018-index.htm",
"price": 135.715,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1095195,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000018/0001823952-26-000018-index.htm",
"price": 136.79,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1095095,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 100,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182415926000009/0001824159-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-07",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: See Remarks",
"reportingCik": "0001824159",
"securityName": "Class B Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Sankar Shyam",
"securitiesOwned": 3663598,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-02",
"transactionType": "C-Conversion",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182415926000009/0001824159-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-07",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: See Remarks",
"reportingCik": "0001824159",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Sankar Shyam",
"securitiesOwned": 677786,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-02",
"transactionType": "C-Conversion",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182415926000009/0001824159-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 130,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-07",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: See Remarks",
"reportingCik": "0001824159",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Sankar Shyam",
"securitiesOwned": 642786,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-02",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182415926000009/0001824159-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 130,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-07-07",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: See Remarks",
"reportingCik": "0001824159",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Sankar Shyam",
"securitiesOwned": 599899,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-02",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 150000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000016/0001823952-26-000016-index.htm",
"price": 130.4783,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1126195,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 900,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000016/0001823952-26-000016-index.htm",
"price": 131.5443,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1122595,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 3600,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000016/0001823952-26-000016-index.htm",
"price": 132.548,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1122095,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 500,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000016/0001823952-26-000016-index.htm",
"price": 133.8146,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1118095,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 4000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000016/0001823952-26-000016-index.htm",
"price": 134.4404,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-17",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1111095,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-15",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 7000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000170518926000011/0001705189-26-000011-index.htm",
"price": 128.8,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-15",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: See Remarks",
"reportingCik": "0001705189",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Buckley Jeffrey",
"securitiesOwned": 60226,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-11",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1481,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000193052626000007/0001930526-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-08",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001930526",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Woersching Eric H.",
"securitiesOwned": 4466,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-04",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 2118,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000184024426000012/0001840244-26-000012-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-08",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001840244",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Stat Lauren Elaina Friedman",
"securitiesOwned": 57140,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-04",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 2118,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182394426000007/0001823944-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-08",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823944",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Schiff Alexandra W.",
"securitiesOwned": 189083,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-04",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 2118,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000182395226000014/0001823952-26-000014-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-08",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001823952",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Moore Alexander D.",
"securitiesOwned": 1127096,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-04",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 2118,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000184024426000010/0001840244-26-000010-index.htm",
"price": 150,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-02",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001840244",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Stat Lauren Elaina Friedman",
"securitiesOwned": 56620,
"transactionDate": "2026-05-29",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1667,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1321655/000184024426000010/0001840244-26-000010-index.htm",
"price": 160,
"symbol": "PLTR",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001321655",
"filingDate": "2026-06-02",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001840244",
"securityName": "Class A Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Stat Lauren Elaina Friedman",
"securitiesOwned": 55022,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-01",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1598,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
}
]Transcript pull(5)
“Focus on U.S. warfighters and national security · Transforming industries with AI · Expansion in U.S. commercial and government sectors · Investment in AI platform and technical hiring”
Investment priority“the appearance of software working is not software working.”
Stated risk · AI Slop“there are certain things that are outside of our control.”
Stated risk · Budget Appropriations“we remain committed to investing in the product pipeline and the most elite technical talent.”
Investment priority · AI Platform Development“the USDA awarded Palantir Technologies Inc. a contract of up to $300 million last month.”
Investment priority · Government Contracts
Glossary(4)
- 8-K
- SEC current report used for material company events, including executive appointments and departures.
- DEF 14A
- Definitive proxy statement containing board, governance, and executive disclosure.
- Trajectory Score
- Footnote's 0-100 estimate of career value and risk for a role/company decision.
- K-anonymity
- Privacy threshold that suppresses aggregate user-contributed metrics until enough contributors exist.
Export preview
CSV preview — first 10 rows of 36, exactly as the download serializes them.
id,claim,value,source_type,confidence fact_001,Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2024): $827.5M.,827519000,fmp_financials,high fact_002,Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2025): $883.9M.,883855000,fmp_financials,high fact_003,Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2025): $1003.7M.,1003697000,fmp_financials,high fact_004,Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2025): $1181.1M.,1181092000,fmp_financials,high fact_005,Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $1406.8M.,1406802000,fmp_financials,high fact_006,Rule of 40 score: 139.8. Revenue growth 84.7% + FCF margin 55.1%.,139.8,derived_fmp,high fact_007,Revenue per employee: $369K (+64.2% YoY).,368612,derived_fmp,medium fact_008,"Insider activity (90d): 49 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 21 equity awards, 0 tax-withholding, 0 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).",1,fmp_insider_trading,medium fact_009,"Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $411,906 for the supplied grant.",411906,derived_equity_scenario,medium fact_010,"12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 51.7%, max drawdown -48.2%, current drawdown -38.8%.",'-48.2,derived_price_history,high
JSON export contents (keys): facts, sections
Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiers