Subject company
NVIDIA Corporation
Senior Silicon Design Engineer · IC5 · Santa Clara, CA
Take the offer seriously and negotiate from strength on equity and scope. The base is effectively at ceiling for this role in this geography — every incremental dollar of negotiation capital should be directed at the RSU grant or vesting structure.
NVIDIA Corporation: Strong trajectory (76/100) — Rule of 40 of 147, stock +21% over twelve months, analyst consensus implying 53% upside to $317.96.
Offer vesting schedule
Web and Digital Interface Designers · Level III · California
This offer’s base sits at the 89th percentile — near the top of the market band.
Your base: $235,000 · $24,190 above the P75 mark — this band is a floor under you, not a ceiling
Source: DOL OFLC LCA disclosure data · n=87 certified filings · base cash only (excludes equity and bonus). Use as a citable market floor, not total compensation.
The negotiation room this brief is built to unlock — typically many multiples of its price. The lever-by-lever play is in the negotiation playbook below.
Strong
company trajectory · high confidence
5-year expected total comp (probability-weighted NPV)
What moves this number
Discount rate: 10%
Vesting over 4 years with 1-year cliff
Bear equity multiple: 0.4x
Base equity multiple: 1.5x
Bull equity multiple: 3.8x
Exit probabilities: bear 20%, base 50%, bull 30%
What to do next
Start here. This section compresses the brief into the decision, the strongest reasons behind it, and the risks that deserve verification before you sign.
Why the verdict landed here
Base $235,000 sits at the 89th percentile of the base-cash market band (median $183,227).
Company operating quality is strong (Rule of 40: 146.9).
What to verify before signing
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Signals we only see when the data is connected
The 12-month cliff trap is structurally more dangerous than the base-case equity math suggests: a 35.8% annualized volatility stock with a -12% current drawdown means there is a material probability the grant price is underwater before a single RSU vests, yet the five-year forecast's base case treats the equity as a reliable wealth-building vehicle.
highRisks + Career upside + Offer economics · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
The Worldwide Field Operations leadership transition — Ajay Puri's retirement replaced by Nicholas Parker as of mid-2026 — creates a measurable go-to-market execution risk precisely when NVIDIA's Q2 $91B guidance requires flawless enterprise sales delivery; if sales cycle elongation materializes on the next earnings call, the analyst consensus target of $317.96 that anchors the entire equity negotiation strategy collapses.
highLeadership and stability + Company quality + Offer economics · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
The organizational diagnosis identifies 'Robotics and AI Integration' and 'Networking Solutions' as themes that vanished without resolution from management's narrative, yet the five-year forecast's bull case and the negotiation leverage both rest on the Vera CPU $200B TAM story — if Vera follows the same pattern of strategic theme abandonment, the role's refresh equity and career-path upside are materially overstated.
highCompany quality + Career upside + Questions to ask · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
NVIDIA's $11.23M lobbying spend concentrated in trade (TRD) and defense (DEF) issue codes, combined with the risk section's explicit dealbreaker around active US export control proceedings on Blackwell and Vera-class silicon, means the $200B TAM that justifies accepting a below-DCF-fair-value grant price of $207.47 is subject to a regulatory binary risk that the leverage section does not price in.
highCompany quality + Risks + Negotiation leverage · medium confidence · 3 source facts in the appendix
Unlock 3 more signals only Footnote connects
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiersScore components
Bar color: strong (65+) · moderate (45–64) · weak (<45)
Higher is healthier on every bar — including Red flags, where a high score means few were raised
Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiersThe decision rule
Accept-leaningDerived from this brief’s own numbers — the band placement, company operating quality, and role exposure — not model judgment. The same rule fixes the verdict above.
- Comp is already placed above market — protect it; negotiate scope, level, or refresh terms instead of base.
- The equity-weighted package (base plus equity plus signing) stays ≥ 1.5× the base-cash median (currently 3.4×).
- Equity is the swing factor — confirm the refresh policy and vest mechanics before relying on the headline number.
- Verification surfaces a dealbreaker (the verification questions in the negotiation playbook) — scope, level, or team stability materially worse than represented.
Alumni outcomes require optional user-contributed career data and confidence thresholds.
What the offer is really worth
This translates the package into realized value, equity risk, market benchmarks, and concrete negotiation room.
base plus equity plus signing
Market consensus
A compact read on whether public-market expectations support the equity story behind the offer.
Keybanc: maintain
Jul 14, 2026 · Overweight → Overweight
Needham: maintain
Jun 02, 2026 · Buy → Buy
DA Davidson: maintain
Jun 01, 2026 · Buy → Buy
Tigress Financial: maintain
May 27, 2026 · Strong Buy → Strong Buy
The $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA California band (median $183,227, n=87), so base is effectively at ceiling for this role in this geography — the negotiation surface is almost entirely on the equity side. The $320,000 RSU grant at current price ($207.47) prices the base scenario at $490,431 using analyst consensus ($317.96 median target) and $509,002 at the street high of $330; with NVDA trading at a -12% drawdown from recent highs and analyst consensus implying 53% upside to $317.96, requesting a 15% equity refresh (to ~$368,000 notional) is defensible and grounded in the stock's 35.8% annualized volatility — frame it as risk-adjusted sizing, not a counter, and anchor to the company's own $80B buyback authorization and $49B free cash flow as evidence the equity is real currency. Equity scenarios use rsu linear and show 137.8% spread across available public valuation anchors.
Evidence confidence: high
Base Already at 89th Percentile — Push Equity: Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California market band (median $183,227, n=87 DOL LCA filings). NVIDIA has already conceded on cash — there is no room to argue underpayment there, and pushing base further risks credibility. The negotiation surface is entirely on the $320,000 RSU grant, where the bear/base/bull scenario spread runs from $214,089 to $490,431 depending on where NVDA trades at vest. Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs at grant; the ask is defensible and keeps total package well above the 3.4× base-cash median headline.
Evidence confidence: medium
Stock Trades at Discount to Analyst Consensus: NVDA closed at $207.47 against an analyst consensus price target of $317.96 — a 53% gap — and a model-derived DCF fair value of $240.93. The stock is also down 12% from its recent peak. This is not a distress signal; NVIDIA's Rule of 40 score is 146.9 and FCF margin is 61.7%. It is, however, a concrete argument that RSUs granted today are priced at a discount to where the street expects the stock to trade during your vest window. Frame the equity ask as: 'I'm accepting grant-date risk at $207 when consensus is $318 — I'd like the grant sized to reflect that gap.'
Evidence confidence: medium
Vera CPU Opens $200B TAM — Timing Matters: On the most recent earnings call, Jensen Huang stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before,' with every major hyperscaler partnering on deployment. A Senior Silicon Design Engineer hired in September 2026 will be ramping precisely as Vera transitions from development to production scale. That timing creates a credible ask for an accelerated first-year vest or a one-time milestone bonus tied to program delivery — not just a larger grant. The script: 'Given the Vera ramp timeline, I'd like to discuss either a 12-month cliff acceleration or a $25,000 program milestone bonus at first tapeout sign-off.'
Evidence confidence: medium
Per the FY2026 DEF 14A proxy (filed 2026-05-12), Jensen Huang's total reported compensation was $36.3M — salary $1.5M, stock awards $24.8M, incentive plan $6.0M, and $4.0M in other compensation. EVP-level named officers (Kress, Teter, Shoquist) each landed in the $14.3–$14.4M range, with stock awards comprising roughly 90% of their total packages — a structure that confirms equity is the dominant compensation vehicle at every level of the house.
From proxy-statement compensation records.
The 90-day insider window shows sustained selling: 7 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, with 11 equity awards and 5 tax-withholding rows excluded as non-discretionary (signal strength: high). The single licensed market data Q3 2026 disposition row — 500,000 shares disposed, zero acquired — is consistent with Tench Coxe's July 1 gift of 500,000 shares (classified neutral), not a distress signal; board members receiving equity awards are holding rather than selling into the open market.
Pattern read derived from Form 4 filing data.
Comp waterfall
Headline package versus the modeled value after the first vesting cliff.
It separates advertised compensation from what is actually exposed to vesting timing.
Anchor negotiation around the gap between headline value and first-year realized value.
Equity scenarios
Cliff risk: leave before the first vesting cliff and realized equity is $0 — the bear case is not the floor. Weigh signing cash accordingly.
Bear, base, and bull public-market anchors for the equity grant.
RSU value is not fixed. A strong offer can still carry material downside if the stock resets.
Ask for equity refresh protection, a higher grant, or signing cash if downside exposure is high.
Directional public-market anchors — not company-specific exec comp or your offer.
California · n=87 · offer at 89th pct
- P10
- $136,000
- P25
- $159,432
- Median
- $183,227
- P75
- $210,810
- P90
- $237,762
Base cash only (year) — excludes equity and bonus.
BLS OEWS floor — Web and Digital Interface Designers, United States (national OEWS) (2025): median $104,000. Government survey median; a conservative floor, not the role-and-metro market the band above reflects.
Peer tickers are selected from public market data and filings — use as directional context, not a compensation survey.
Not available for this run: next earnings date. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
Growing — new sponsored-hire approvals rose in the latest complete fiscal year. Denial rate across the window: 0.7%. Still actively attesting: 1,872 certified LCA filings in FY2025 — the freshest read on sponsorship intent, ahead of the slower petition record.
Petition approvals from the federal record — counts of approvals, not people; one person can hold multiple petitions across years. LCA filings are attestations, not hires. A fiscal year marked “prelim.” is still being published by USCIS and is left out of the trend. Read the trend, not the absolute size.
This employer sponsors a 401(k) plan in the federal benefit-plan record. Headcount and the match below read from its retirement plan on file — NVIDIA CORPORATION 401(K) PLAN.
Audited DOL Form 5500 filings for FY2024, which lag the calendar by roughly one to two years. Counts are PLAN PARTICIPANTS — covered employees plus separated staff still holding a balance — not a headcount, and are read from the single representative retirement plan, never summed across a sponsor’s plans. Employer contributions are the plan’s Schedule H line 2a (the match); a blank contribution line means it was not disclosed at this grain, not that it was zero. The absence of a line is never the absence of the benefit.
Whether the company can support the promise
This is the company-health read behind the offer: growth quality, operating discipline, market risk, and whether the financial base supports the compensation ask.
Revenue mix
Data Center
Gaming
Professional Visualization
Latest reported segmentation, period as filed · USD. Panels may cover different filing periods — do not total one against the other.
Where geographic revenue comes from
UNITED STATES
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA
CHINA
Latest reported segmentation, period as filed · USD. Panels may cover different filing periods — do not total one against the other.
Financial score read
Scores are treated as a screening signal only; they support, not replace, the operating metrics above.
Recent events that change the read
Nvidia's Brilliant ‘Freemium' Software Hook is Why I'm Loading Up for The Long Term
NVIDIA is the Cheapest It's Looked in Over 7 Years — The Market's Dead Wrong to Price Peak Growth
Can NVIDIA's Sovereign AI Push Unlock New Revenue Streams Now?
Source feeds are filtered to a short materiality read; the brief avoids raw news-feed dumps.
Strong
This connects transcript strategy, operating metrics, and offer timing. A coherent company story strengthens equity confidence; drift or mixed messaging shifts emphasis toward cash certainty and explicit role scope.
NVIDIA is operating at a fundamentally different altitude than its peers: 85.2% YoY revenue growth against a peer-group median of 21.8%, a Rule of 40 score of 146.9, and 61.7% FCF margin — these are not metrics that require hedging. The offer itself is structurally strong: base of $235,000 sits at the 89th percentile of the California H-1B/LCA market band (median $183,227), and the $320,000 RSU grant produces a base-case equity value of $490,431 at the analyst consensus target of $317.96, against a bear-case of $214,089 at the $138.80 low target — the equity spread of 137.8% is the primary risk variable to negotiate around. The candidate's profile — RTL-through-tapeout on three shipped GPU/accelerator programs, block team lead experience on a datacenter part, and a current role at Tenstorrent — is directly on-point for NVIDIA's stated priority of growing inference market share and deploying Vera CPU, which management described as a '$200 billion TAM we have never addressed before'; that specificity is the negotiation anchor: ask for an equity refresh schedule tied to Vera milestones or an accelerated first-year vest, not a base increase that is already above market.
Evidence confidence: medium
Rule of 40 score 147 — revenue growth 85.2% plus FCF margin 61.7%.
Evidence confidence: high
Annualized volatility 35.8%; max 12-month drawdown -20.2%; current drawdown -12%.
Evidence confidence: high
Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The strategic narrative shows a consistent focus on AI infrastructure and growth, with a clear evolution in themes and investment areas across quarters. However, some risks remain persistent, indicating areas for improvement.
Evidence confidence: high
Consistent themes across quarters: AI Infrastructure Growth, Geopolitical Issues, Supply Chain Constraints.
Evidence confidence: high
Themes that vanished without resolution: Robotics and AI Integration, Networking Solutions.
Evidence confidence: medium
Disappeared themes may indicate strategic pivot or de-prioritization.
Newly appeared themes: Generative AI Transition, Agentic AI Proliferation, Sovereign AI Business Expansion, Partnerships and Collaborations, Market Segmentation, Product Development.
Evidence confidence: medium
The focus on AI and infrastructure growth suggests strong future opportunities in these sectors, but ongoing geopolitical and supply chain risks may impact stability.
Evidence confidence: high
Reported lobbying spend of $11.23M across 30 LDA/SOPR filings (24 months). Primary issue codes: TRD (30), CPI (27), DEF (15), ENG (8), LBR (8).
In their own words
Verbatim from the latest earnings call — management’s stated risks and investment priorities, unedited.
“While we are not immune to supply challenges, we remain confident in our ability to support the growth opportunity ahead.”
“We are not including any China data center compute revenue in our outlook.”
“We will make investments necessary to deliver the industry's lowest cost per token.”
“We are on track to commence production shipments of VeraRubin in the second half of this year.”
Rule of 40
Growth plus margin clears the 40 line — the company is growing with discipline, not buying growth with weak margins. That strengthens the case for equity.
Revenue growth and free-cash-flow margin combined into an operating-quality score.
It gives a quick read on whether growth is disciplined or being bought with weak margins.
Use a strong score as support for a stronger equity or refresh ask.
Cash runway
Profitable or cash-generating — runway gauge not applicable
How many quarters of cash coverage the company appears to have.
Cash stress changes negotiation posture and role risk.
If runway is thin, prefer cash/signing certainty over back-loaded equity.
Revenue per employee
Revenue productivity per employee from company financial and headcount data.
High productivity supports premium compensation; weak productivity can foreshadow cost pressure.
Use strong productivity as support for a strategic-hire compensation argument.
Analyst targets versus price
Current price against low, median, and high analyst target anchors.
It frames whether the market already prices in most of the upside.
Use wide dispersion as a reason to derisk vesting or ask for more shares.
Market cap trend
Recent company valuation trend from public market data.
It contextualizes equity timing and whether the offer arrives after a run-up or reset.
Pair this with stock-risk metrics before accepting equity-heavy compensation.
What could make this role better or worse than it looks
This section turns leadership, insider, board, and market signals into career-risk context for the role you are considering — and carries the forward scenarios: the base case and the three forks this offer can take.
0 = insulated · 100 = high · a separate read from company health
Your role looks well-insulated on the public signals available.
Company revenue is up 108% across the available quarters, which lowers role exposure at the company level.
4 executive departures in the last 12 months. · source
Public court records, aggregated at the employer level. Individual parties are not shown; the docket links go to the primary source.
named as defendant in 22 trade secret / IP cases (most recent 2026-07-17).
Concluded U.S. DOL Wage & Hour cases, matched to this employer by name and aggregated. A clean record here is not a guarantee; a case filed under a differently-spelled entity may not be captured.
1 concluded U.S. DOL Wage & Hour case on record (most recent findings 2024-04-29).
Litigation (public court records)
On file — see detail above
Wage enforcement (U.S. DOL WHD)
On file — see detail above
Workplace safety (U.S. OSHA)
None in the record
DOL debarment
None in the record
Limitations
No Item 2.05 restructuring 8-Ks matched this employer in the lookback window.
No WARN notices matched (coverage is strongest in CA and NY).
No public ATS board is mapped for this employer, so hiring velocity is unavailable.
Public court-records lookup degraded this run — litigation posture may be incomplete.
Segment-level revenue is rarely disclosed; the revenue signal uses the company total as a proxy.
Leadership graph (resolved): Nicholas Parker — Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations (since 2026-08-24); Suzanne Nora Johnson — member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee (since 2026-07-13); Donald F. Robertson Jr. — Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer (since 2026-05-04); Scott C. Gawel — Chief Accounting Officer (since 2026-05-04); Ellen Ochoa — member of the Board (since 2024-11-07); Timothy S. Teter — Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary (since 2018-01-01); Colette M. Kress — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since 2013-01-01); Ajay K. Puri — Executive Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations (since 2009-01-01); Debora Shoquist — Executive Vice President of Operations (since 2009-01-01); Jen-Hsun Huang — President and Chief Executive Officer (since 1993-01-01); William J. Dally — Chief Scientist & Senior Vice President of Research; Chris A. Malachowsky — Co-Founder
Evidence confidence: medium
SEAWELL A BROOKE: option_exercise_hold (neutral).
Evidence confidence: medium
Shah Aarti S.: option_exercise_hold (neutral).
Evidence confidence: medium
STEVENS MARK A: option_exercise_hold (positive).
Evidence confidence: medium
COXE TENCH: gift (neutral).
Evidence confidence: medium
NORA JOHNSON SUZANNE M: other (neutral).
Evidence confidence: medium
Nicholas Parker hire: Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations
Evidence confidence: medium
The most likely regret scenario is equity erosion compounded by a 12-month cliff trap: NVDA's stock, already trading at $207.47 against a consensus target of $317.96, reverses sharply as hyperscaler capex cycles compress or export control restrictions on H100/Blackwell shipments to China tighten further, pulling the stock below the $138.80 bear-case analyst target — a scenario the 35.8% annualized volatility makes statistically plausible within 18 months. The user onboards September 15, 2026, during Nicholas Parker's leadership transition in Worldwide Field Operations, and discovers that the Vera CPU program — the $200B TAM Jensen Huang cited — is 18–24 months from meaningful silicon tapeout contribution at the IC5 level, meaning the role is scoped to sustaining Blackwell derivatives rather than the greenfield CPU work that made the opportunity compelling. By month 13, the first RSU cliff vests at a stock price materially below grant price, the $60,000 signing bonus clawback window has just closed, and the user is locked into a below-water equity position with no refresh grant issued because IC5 refresh cycles at NVIDIA run 24–36 months from hire date — leaving total realized year-two comp well below the $535,000 headline figure that anchored the decision.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVDA stock closes below $175 (a 16% decline from the $207.47 grant price) and holds that level for 30+ consecutive trading days within the first 6 months of employment — this is the threshold at which the $320,000 RSU grant's bear-case value ($214,089) becomes the base case, not the tail, and…
Evidence confidence: medium
Nicholas Parker's Worldwide Field Operations transition produces a measurable go-to-market disruption: watch for NVIDIA's Q1 or Q2 FY2027 earnings calls to cite 'sales cycle elongation,' 'enterprise deal slippage,' or a sequential revenue miss in the Data Center segment — any of these signals that…
Evidence confidence: medium
The $235,000 base lands at the 89th percentile of the California base-cash market band (median $183,227, n=87 DOL H-1B filings), giving the candidate a structurally superior starting position before a single RSU vests. The headline package of $615,000 — base plus $320,000 in RSUs plus $60,000 signing — is 3.4× the base-cash median, though that multiple is only meaningful because equity and signing are excluded from the band itself. NVIDIA's Rule of 40 of 146.9, 85.2% revenue growth against a peer-group median of 21.8%, and a 61.7% FCF margin confirm the RSU component is backed by a financially dominant platform, making the equity tranche the primary negotiation lever: push for a larger grant or an accelerated cliff, not base.
Evidence confidence: medium
Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
SEC leadership records alumni reference: 8 executive transitions; top buckets: other (5), departure (2), hyperscaler (1).
Evidence confidence: medium
Three forks
The three ways this role can go from here — the downside path, the base case, and the upside. Each fork carries a signal of its own direction or says plainly that none was extracted; a fork never borrows the nearest available sentence.
NVDA stock closes below $175 (a 16% decline from the $207.47 grant price) and holds that level for 30+ consecutive trading days within the first 6 months of employment — this is the threshold at which the $320,000 RSU grant's bear-case value ($214,089) becomes the base case, not the tail, and…
The $235,000 base lands at the 89th percentile of the California base-cash market band (median $183,227, n=87 DOL H-1B f
If the answer is no or ambiguous, the $200B TAM narrative that justified the career move does not apply to this specific headcount, and the role's strategic leverage — and therefore refresh equity…
Leadership tape
Source-backed leadership facts are used conservatively; unresolved or sparse records are omitted from user-facing claims.
Nicholas Parker
2026-08-24hire: role → Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations
“appointed Nicholas Parker, age 55, as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations”
Suzanne Nora Johnson
2026-07-13hire: role → member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee
“appointed Suzanne Nora Johnson as a member of the Board and as a member of the Audit Committee”
Donald Robertson
2026-05-04retirement: VP and Chief Accounting Officer → VP, Finance
“intention to retire from his role as VP and CAO”
Scott Gawel
2026-05-04hire: role → VP and CAO
“appointed Scott Gawel, age 55, as VP and CAO”
Coverage note
Insider intensity
Form 4 buy/sell activity summarized by month.
Heavy selling does not automatically mean distress, but it changes how much equity risk you should accept.
Use sustained selling as support for vest protection or more cash.
Institutional ownership
6,234 institutional holders (latest 13F)
How much of the float sits with institutions, and across how many holders.
Ownership mix can amplify volatility and market sensitivity.
Treat concentrated ownership as another reason to stress-test equity-heavy offers.
Not available for this run: dated C-suite tenure, board interlocks, and largest-holder position sizes. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
Employer durability versus peers
How this company's financial health reads against its public peers — every company scored on the identical rubric, from its own filings. This is a durability comparison, not a list of jobs you could take instead.
Financial health, one rubric
Every company below is scored by the same rule — Rule of 40, revenue growth, cash runway — from its own filings. No cross-company guessing.
Financial health on one rubric: NVDA scores 95; peers — AVGO 95, ADI 89, AAPL 69, ENTG 56; peer median 89.
Evidence confidence: medium
Financial-health axis only — leadership, career, and role factors are not honestly comparable across companies from public filings alone.
No user-contributed tenure aggregate has passed k-anonymity for this company yet.
Evidence confidence: low — read the specifics as directional, not verified
How to use the brief in the conversation
This is the action layer: the asks to prioritize, the scripts to use, the questions to ask, and the dealbreakers to monitor.
Your base is already at the 89th percentile of the California market — NVIDIA has been generous there, and you should acknowledge it. The opening move is to accept that the base conversation is largely closed and redirect the entire counter toward equity. Open with something like: 'I'm genuinely excited about this role and I want to make this work — I just want to make sure the equity side reflects the scope of what I'd be owning.' The $320,000 RSU grant is the gap. Your target is $370,000. Lead with that number, once, calmly, with one reason. Don't stack arguments. Don't mention base. The recurring annual uplift if equity lands at target is $32,500 — real money, and a credible ask given the business's economics.
Your counter, lever by lever
The offer base of $235,000 sits at the 89th percentile of the California market band (median $183,227, p75 $210,810, n=87 DOL LCA filings). There is no credible underpayment argument here — pushing base further risks undermining the equity ask. The floor is $235,000 and the target of $255,000 is a stretch ask only if equity movement is off the table entirely. Lead with equity; treat base as a fallback lever, not the opening.
computed room, anchored to DOL market p75 (floor at market median)
The current RSU grant of $320,000 is the primary negotiation surface. The target is $370,000 — a $50,000 increase in grant value, which at the current stock price of $207.47 translates to roughly 241 additional shares. The bear/base/bull scenario spread on the existing grant runs from $214,089 to $490,431, meaning the candidate is accepting meaningful grant-date risk at a price that is 53% below analyst consensus of $317.96 and 16% below the model-derived DCF fair value of $240.93. A $370,000 grant is a defensible ask given the company's FCF margin of 61.7% and revenue per employee of $1,943,214 — NVIDIA's own economics support competing aggressively for silicon talent with RTL-through-tapeout ownership on datacenter programs.
computed equity room
The current signing bonus of $60,000 is the bridge across a 12-month equity cliff. Year-one realized comp is $235,000 base plus $60,000 signing — $295,000 — versus $535,000 in year two once RSUs begin flowing. The target here is framed as an additional $20,000 (bringing the total to $80,000) to better bridge that cliff gap, particularly given annualized stock volatility of 35.8% and a current drawdown of -12%. The floor is $60,000. Use the signing ask only if equity movement stalls — it is a one-time bridge, not the primary lever. Also confirm the clawback window: if it runs 24 months, negotiate it down to 12 or request monthly vesting of the bonus.
one-time bridge sized to the base gap (use if they cannot move base)
This is a non-cash lever but a real one. The candidate has RTL-through-tapeout ownership on three shipped GPU/accelerator programs and led a 6-engineer block team on a datacenter part — experience that maps directly to NVIDIA's Vera CPU ramp, which Jensen Huang described as opening a $200 billion TAM on the most recent earnings call. If the recruiter cannot move equity or signing, the scope ask is: confirm IC5 leveling is correct (not IC4), negotiate an annual equity refresh cadence into the offer letter, and ask for a $25,000 program milestone bonus tied to first tapeout sign-off. These are structural protections that compound over time and cost the company less than a larger grant upfront.
non-cash lever: leveling, scope, and equity-refresh cadence
Scripts
Written to be sent as they are. Edit any of them before you copy.
When they push back
“Your base is already above what we pay most people at this level — we don't have room to move the overall package.”
I completely understand, and honestly the base is not where I'm focused. I think NVIDIA has been fair there. What I'd really like to work on is just the equity grant — that's the one number I'd like to revisit. The base can stay exactly where it is.
“The RSU grant is set by our internal bands and we can't go above the range for IC5.”
That makes sense, and I'm not asking you to break a band. I guess my question is whether there's any flexibility within the band, or whether a one-time signing increase could bridge the gap if the equity truly can't move. I want to find a path that works for both sides.
“We don't negotiate equity — what you see is what everyone at your level gets.”
I hear you, and I appreciate the transparency. If equity is fixed, can we talk about the signing bonus? Getting that to $80,000 would go a long way toward making the first year work, especially with the cliff structure. That feels like a reasonable middle ground.
“We need a decision by end of week — do you have another offer or are you just negotiating?”
I do have another offer I'm considering, yes. But I want to be honest — this is the role I want. I'm not trying to drag this out. If we can get to $370,000 on the equity, I can give you a decision today. I just need to feel like the package reflects the work I'd be doing.
“The signing bonus has a clawback — if you leave before two years you'd owe it back.”
Thanks for flagging that — I did want to ask about the clawback window. Would it be possible to structure the repayment on a monthly vesting schedule, or bring the window down to twelve months? Given the equity cliff, I want to make sure the signing isn't creating a situation where I'm exposed in year one on both fronts.
“I've genuinely valued this process and I have a lot of respect for the team — if the package can't move from where it is today, I need to take the other opportunity, but I'd welcome a conversation if anything changes on your end.”
Targets are computed from your offer and a 8% base / 15% equity negotiation-room estimate; anchored to the DOL LCA market band for California, where your base sits at roughly the 89th percentile; They are derived deterministically, not written by the model.
Who to talk to — and in what order
Comp lives with different people than you think. Aim each ask at the person who can actually move it.
Owns the offer number and can move base / signing within a set band.
Your first channel. Make the case here: give them the market floor and one clear, specific ask. Stay warm — they're your messenger, not your obstacle.
Owns level, scope, and the business case for hiring you.
Your advocate. Loop them in for a level bump, equity, or when the recruiter says the band is fixed — they can request an exception the recruiter can't.
Sets the salary bands; rarely negotiates with you directly.
You almost never talk to them. But the hiring manager can push an out-of-band exception up to them — which is why winning the manager matters.
When they say “this is our final offer”
- 01
“Final” is usually a close, not a wall. Stay gracious, restate your value in one line, and make a single specific, justified ask — not a list.
- 02
If base is capped, trade levers: pivot to a signing bonus, an equity refresh, an accelerated first review, or a title/level adjustment.
- 03
Only invoke a deadline or competing interest if it's real. A bluff that gets called costs you leverage and goodwill.
- 04
Give them an easy yes: name the one thing that turns a maybe into a signature today.
“I really want to make this work — I’m ready to sign. The one thing that would let me say yes today is [specific ask]. Is there any room there?”
Base Already at 89th Percentile — Push Equity
Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California market band (median $183,227, n=87 DOL LCA filings). NVIDIA has already conceded on cash — there is no room to argue underpayment there, and pushing base further risks credibility. The negotiation surface is entirely on the $320,000 RSU grant, where the bear/base/bull scenario spread runs from $214,089 to $490,431 depending on where NVDA trades at vest. Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs at grant; the ask is defensible and keeps total package well above the 3.4× base-cash median headline.
Evidence anchor: DOL H-1B/LCA California comp band (n=87); computed equity scenario values (bear $214,089 / base $490,431 / bull $509,002)
Stock Trades at Discount to Analyst Consensus
NVDA closed at $207.47 against an analyst consensus price target of $317.96 — a 53% gap — and a model-derived DCF fair value of $240.93. The stock is also down 12% from its recent peak. This is not a distress signal; NVIDIA's Rule of 40 score is 146.9 and FCF margin is 61.7%. It is, however, a concrete argument that RSUs granted today are priced at a discount to where the street expects the stock to trade during your vest window. Frame the equity ask as: 'I'm accepting grant-date risk at $207 when consensus is $318 — I'd like the grant sized to reflect that gap.'
Evidence anchor: Computed metrics: stock price $207.465, analyst median target $317.96, DCF fair value $240.93, current drawdown -12%
Vera CPU Opens $200B TAM — Timing Matters
On the most recent earnings call, Jensen Huang stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before,' with every major hyperscaler partnering on deployment. A Senior Silicon Design Engineer hired in September 2026 will be ramping precisely as Vera transitions from development to production scale. That timing creates a credible ask for an accelerated first-year vest or a one-time milestone bonus tied to program delivery — not just a larger grant. The script: 'Given the Vera ramp timeline, I'd like to discuss either a 12-month cliff acceleration or a $25,000 program milestone bonus at first tapeout sign-off.'
Evidence anchor: NVIDIA FY2027 Q1 earnings transcript (strategic priorities); GRAPH CONTEXT transition data
Revenue Per Employee Justifies a Larger Grant
NVIDIA generates $1,943,214 in revenue per employee — up 58.8% year-over-year — against a headcount of 42,000 (per the FY2026 10-K filed 2026-02-25). At a gross margin of 74.9% and FCF margin of 61.7%, each incremental silicon design hire is extraordinarily productive. The company is not in cost-containment mode: the FY2026 10-K shows headcount grew from 36,000 to 42,000 in a single year. Use this to argue that NVIDIA can afford to compete aggressively for silicon talent and that the $320,000 RSU grant is below what the company's own economics support for a role with RTL-through-tapeout ownership on datacenter parts.
Evidence anchor: NVIDIA 10-K (SEC filing 2026-02-25, employee count 42,000); computed revenue/employee $1,943,214 YoY +58.8%; FCF margin 61.7%
$60K Signing Is Thin Cover for a 12-Month Cliff
The offer structure has a 12-month cliff before any RSU vests, meaning year-one realized comp is $235,000 base plus the $60,000 signing — $295,000 total, versus $535,000 in year two and beyond once equity flows. The $60,000 signing does not adequately bridge that cliff gap, particularly given annualized stock volatility of 35.8% and a current drawdown of -12%. A reasonable counter is $85,000–$100,000 in signing, or alternatively a 25% first-year vest acceleration (one quarter's worth of the $320,000 grant, roughly $80,000) to reduce cliff exposure. The script: 'The cliff creates meaningful income concentration risk in year one — I'd like to either increase the signing to $90,000 or discuss a partial first-year vest to smooth the ramp.'
Evidence anchor: Offer details: signing $60,000, RSU $320,000, vest 4y cliff 1y; computed: after-cliff year-1 $535,000; stock volatility 35.8%, drawdown -12%
Questions they cannot fake
- 1
The offer grants $320,000 in RSUs at a 4-year linear vest. NVDA is trading at $207 today against an analyst consensus target of $317.96 and a DCF fair value of $240. Can we set the grant at a fixed number of shares rather than a fixed dollar value, so I capture upside if the stock moves toward consensus before my September 15 start date?
RSU grants at most companies are denominated in shares, not dollars, but the grant date is typically the first day of employment or the next board approval window — which could be weeks after your start. If the stock rises from $207 toward the $317.96 median target before the grant date is set, a dollar-denominated grant shrinks your share count. Locking in shares now protects you. This is a mechanical ask with no cost to NVIDIA and signals you understand how equity actually works.
- 2
NVIDIA's revenue grew 85.2% year-over-year versus a peer-group median of 21.8%, and the company just guided Q2 to $91 billion. Given that trajectory, what is the refresh equity cadence — specifically, how frequently are IC5 engineers reviewed for additional RSU grants, and what is the typical refresh size relative to the initial grant at this level?
Your $320,000 initial grant is real money, but at a company compounding this fast, the refresh cycle is where long-tenure wealth is built. NVIDIA's stock-based compensation ran at 2.7% of revenue TTM — a disciplined number for a company this size — which means refreshes are structured, not ad hoc. Understanding the refresh cadence tells you whether your equity exposure grows with the company's trajectory or flatlines after year one.
- 3
The $60,000 signing bonus is presumably subject to a clawback if I leave within 12 months. What is the exact clawback window and structure — is it pro-rated monthly or a binary 100% repayment — and does it apply if NVIDIA eliminates my role?
A $60,000 signing bonus with a 12-month binary clawback is a meaningful contingent liability. You are leaving Tenstorrent, where you hold unvested equity, and the signing bonus is partly compensating for that forfeiture. If the clawback is binary rather than pro-rated, you carry full exposure through month 11. Knowing whether an involuntary separation triggers repayment is not paranoia — it is basic risk accounting on a six-figure number.
- 4
My background is RTL through tapeout on three shipped GPU and accelerator programs, including leading a 6-engineer block team on a datacenter part. NVIDIA's earnings call cited Vera CPU as a brand-new $200 billion TAM and a top strategic priority. Is this IC5 role scoped to contribute to Vera or Blackwell successor programs, and what is the path to IC6 for someone with a tapeout leadership track record?
This question does two things simultaneously. It signals that you have read the earnings transcript and understand where NVIDIA is placing its bets, and it forces a concrete answer about scope and promotion velocity. NVIDIA grew headcount from 29,600 to 42,000 in two years — a 42% increase — which means the org is still being built. An IC5 who shipped datacenter silicon and led a block team should be asking whether this role is a lateral or a platform for IC6 within 18 to 24 months.
Dealbreakers to watch
Equity Grant Priced at a 14% Discount to Analyst Consensus — Upside Is Real but Asymmetric
mediumYour $320,000 RSU grant was priced at NVDA's current stock price of $207.47. Analyst consensus sits at $317.96 (median) with a bull target of $330, implying 53–59% upside on the base/bull scenario — which would put your equity at $490K–$509K at vest. The bear case, however, uses the analyst low of $138.80, which would compress your $320K grant to roughly $214K — a 33% haircut. With annualized volatility at 35.8% and a current drawdown of -12% from recent highs, the spread between bear and base scenarios is $276K on a $320K grant. The equity is the right lever to push on: ask for a higher share count (not dollar value) locked at grant-date price, or request an accelerated first-year cliff to reduce time-in-market risk on the bear tail.
Source ↗ · NVDA FY2026 10-K (filed 2026-02-25); analyst price target consensus and equity scenario modeling from computed metricsSustained Insider Selling With Zero Open-Market Buys in the Last 90 Days
mediumThe 90-day insider pattern shows 7 open-market sells and 0 open-market buys among discretionary transactions (11 equity awards and 5 tax-withholding rows excluded as non-discretionary). The most notable discrete event: Tench Coxe gifted 500,000 shares on 2026-07-01 — a transfer that removes economic exposure without triggering a taxable sale. This is not a fire alarm; NVDA insiders have been systematic sellers throughout the stock's multi-year run. But it does mean no named insider is adding exposure at current prices. For a candidate receiving RSUs priced at $207.47 against a DCF fair value of $240.93 and a median analyst target of $317.96, the insider posture is a useful calibration: the people with the most information are reducing, not adding.
Source ↗ · SEC Form 4 filings (multiple, 2026-06-29 through 2026-07-06); FMP insider statistics Q3 2026: 500,000 shares disposed, 0 acquiredWorldwide Field Operations Leadership Transition Adds Near-Term Organizational Uncertainty
mediumNVIDIA appointed Nicholas Parker (age 55, from Microsoft) as EVP of Worldwide Field Operations effective 2026-08-24 — your start date is September 15, 2026, meaning you will onboard during a leadership transition in the sales and go-to-market org. Separately, Ajay K. Puri, who held that EVP role since 2009, is departing. For a silicon design IC5, this is not a direct reporting-chain risk, but it signals potential shifts in how engineering priorities get translated into customer commitments and product roadmap sequencing. Ask your hiring manager explicitly which product programs your block team supports and whether those programs have locked customer commitments (e.g., hyperscaler design wins) that survive a GTM leadership change.
Source ↗ · NVIDIA 8-K filed 2026-07-02 (nvda-20260628.htm); graph transition record: Nicholas Parker hire, joined from Microsoft Corporation$60K Signing Bonus Is Likely Clawback-Exposed — Verify the Repayment Window Against Your Vest Cliff
lowThe offer includes a $60,000 signing bonus with a September 15, 2026 start date and a 4-year RSU vest (standard NVDA structure implies a 1-year cliff). Industry-standard signing bonus clawback windows at NVIDIA run 12–24 months. If the clawback period extends to 24 months and you depart before the cliff, you would owe back the full $60K while having vested $0 in equity — a net negative cash position in year one. The $60K represents 25.5% of base salary; it is meaningful enough to negotiate the clawback window down to 12 months or to request that it be structured as a forgivable loan vesting monthly. Confirm the exact repayment schedule in the offer letter before signing.
Pre-mortem: what would make this offer fail
These are the brief’s highest-friction warnings converted into diligence prompts before you sign.
- 1
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Canonical action signals
Base Already at 89th Percentile — Push Equity: Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California market band (median $183,227, n=87 DOL LCA filings). NVIDIA has already conceded on cash — there is no room to argue underpayment there, and pushing base further risks credibility. The negotiation surface is entirely on the $320,000 RSU grant, where the bear/base/bull scenario spread runs from $214,089 to $490,431 depending on where NVDA trades at vest. Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs at grant; the ask is defensible and keeps total package well above the 3.4× base-cash median headline.
Evidence confidence: medium
Stock Trades at Discount to Analyst Consensus: NVDA closed at $207.47 against an analyst consensus price target of $317.96 — a 53% gap — and a model-derived DCF fair value of $240.93. The stock is also down 12% from its recent peak. This is not a distress signal; NVIDIA's Rule of 40 score is 146.9 and FCF margin is 61.7%. It is, however, a concrete argument that RSUs granted today are priced at a discount to where the street expects the stock to trade during your vest window. Frame the equity ask as: 'I'm accepting grant-date risk at $207 when consensus is $318 — I'd like the grant sized to reflect that gap.'
Evidence confidence: medium
Vera CPU Opens $200B TAM — Timing Matters: On the most recent earnings call, Jensen Huang stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before,' with every major hyperscaler partnering on deployment. A Senior Silicon Design Engineer hired in September 2026 will be ramping precisely as Vera transitions from development to production scale. That timing creates a credible ask for an accelerated first-year vest or a one-time milestone bonus tied to program delivery — not just a larger grant. The script: 'Given the Vera ramp timeline, I'd like to discuss either a 12-month cliff acceleration or a $25,000 program milestone bonus at first tapeout sign-off.'
Evidence confidence: medium
The offer grants $320,000 in RSUs at a 4-year linear vest. NVDA is trading at $207 today against an analyst consensus target of $317.96 and a DCF fair value of $240. Can we set the grant at a fixed number of shares rather than a fixed dollar value, so I capture upside if the stock moves toward consensus before my September 15 start date? Why: RSU grants at most companies are denominated in shares, not dollars, but the grant date is typically the first day of employment or the next board approval window — which could be weeks after your start. If the stock rises from $207 toward the $317.96 median target before the grant date is set, a dollar-denominated grant shrinks your share count. Locking in shares now protects you. This is a mechanical ask with no cost to NVIDIA and signals you understand how equity actually works.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVIDIA's revenue grew 85.2% year-over-year versus a peer-group median of 21.8%, and the company just guided Q2 to $91 billion. Given that trajectory, what is the refresh equity cadence — specifically, how frequently are IC5 engineers reviewed for additional RSU grants, and what is the typical refresh size relative to the initial grant at this level? Why: Your $320,000 initial grant is real money, but at a company compounding this fast, the refresh cycle is where long-tenure wealth is built. NVIDIA's stock-based compensation ran at 2.7% of revenue TTM — a disciplined number for a company this size — which means refreshes are structured, not ad hoc. Understanding the refresh cadence tells you whether your equity exposure grows with the company's trajectory or flatlines after year one.
Evidence confidence: medium
The $60,000 signing bonus is presumably subject to a clawback if I leave within 12 months. What is the exact clawback window and structure — is it pro-rated monthly or a binary 100% repayment — and does it apply if NVIDIA eliminates my role? Why: A $60,000 signing bonus with a 12-month binary clawback is a meaningful contingent liability. You are leaving Tenstorrent, where you hold unvested equity, and the signing bonus is partly compensating for that forfeiture. If the clawback is binary rather than pro-rated, you carry full exposure through month 11. Knowing whether an involuntary separation triggers repayment is not paranoia — it is basic risk accounting on a six-figure number.
Evidence confidence: medium
The most likely regret scenario is equity erosion compounded by a 12-month cliff trap: NVDA's stock, already trading at $207.47 against a consensus target of $317.96, reverses sharply as hyperscaler capex cycles compress or export control restrictions on H100/Blackwell shipments to China tighten further, pulling the stock below the $138.80 bear-case analyst target — a scenario the 35.8% annualized volatility makes statistically plausible within 18 months. The user onboards September 15, 2026, during Nicholas Parker's leadership transition in Worldwide Field Operations, and discovers that the Vera CPU program — the $200B TAM Jensen Huang cited — is 18–24 months from meaningful silicon tapeout contribution at the IC5 level, meaning the role is scoped to sustaining Blackwell derivatives rather than the greenfield CPU work that made the opportunity compelling. By month 13, the first RSU cliff vests at a stock price materially below grant price, the $60,000 signing bonus clawback window has just closed, and the user is locked into a below-water equity position with no refresh grant issued because IC5 refresh cycles at NVIDIA run 24–36 months from hire date — leaving total realized year-two comp well below the $535,000 headline figure that anchored the decision.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVDA stock closes below $175 (a 16% decline from the $207.47 grant price) and holds that level for 30+ consecutive trading days within the first 6 months of employment — this is the threshold at which the $320,000 RSU grant's bear-case value ($214,089) becomes the base case, not the tail, and…
Evidence confidence: medium
Nicholas Parker's Worldwide Field Operations transition produces a measurable go-to-market disruption: watch for NVIDIA's Q1 or Q2 FY2027 earnings calls to cite 'sales cycle elongation,' 'enterprise deal slippage,' or a sequential revenue miss in the Data Center segment — any of these signals that…
Evidence confidence: medium
Not available for this run: exit terms on the public record. Every stream we checked — rendered, held, or absent — is itemized in the appendix coverage matrix.
Your profile vs this role
Optional user-provided profile context is separated from company diligence so the brief remains clear about what is public data and what is personalized advice.
Senior Silicon Design Engineer focused on measurable outcomes at NVIDIA Corporation
Ties the profile headline to the target role and company context instead of generic scope.
Silicon Design Engineer II with Advanced Micro Devices operating context
Uses the most recent role as credibility while keeping the target role visible.
- Make the first two lines specific to the role you want next.
- Replace broad claims with one quantified outcome from your last two roles.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Advanced Micro Devices, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Qualcomm, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Tenstorrent, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Role progression is present, but aggregate peer benchmarks remain k-anonymity gated.
A self-profile signal from your upload — separate from the company composite score.
- →Rewrite the headline to name the target role and operating context.
- →Add one quantified bullet to each of the last three roles.
- →Add evidence for System design if you genuinely have it.
Source: user-uploaded LinkedIn export Positions.csv/Profile.csv/Skills.csv.
Messages.csv is never parsed or stored.
What this brief covers — and what it can’t
Public-company evidence: financial health and trajectory, leadership and board signals, role-level exposure (restructuring filings, WARN notices), the citable market wage band, insider filing patterns, and the negotiation math built from them.
Your future manager and team, day-to-day culture, benefit terms the filings don’t carry (the 401k match formula, PTO, parental leave, healthcare costs), and private-company comparisons. Where a DOL Form 5500 filing matched, the plan-level 401k facts appear above — the day-to-day terms still don’t. That’s what the verification questions in §6 are for — ask them before you sign.
Evidence and methodology
The main brief stays readable; the supporting facts, confidence map, source logs, methodology, and export preview live here for auditability.
Confidence and data gaps
- Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Sources cross-referenced
Data coverage
This tracks whether available evidence is rendered, held for methodology, gated by confidence, or unavailable.
Canonical verdict and one-number model
Canonical
Rendered in the executive decision screen.
Canonical section claims
Canonical · 54 items
Rendered across the guided chapters as concise evidence cards.
Supporting facts and methodology notes
Canonical · 39 items
Kept in the appendix so the main report stays readable.
Revenue product and geographic segmentation
Fetched · 9 items
Top segments are rendered in Company Quality; full rows remain source data.
Analyst estimates, grades, DCF, targets, earnings
Fetched
Rendered as market-consensus cards instead of raw analyst feeds.
News, press releases, and M&A events
Fetched · 6 items
Material recent events are summarized; raw feed clutter is omitted from the main flow.
Ownership concentration and financial health scores
Fetched
Rendered in Role and Career Risk when it changes the risk read.
Career signal layer leadership and board coverage
Computed
Rendered as leadership tape, coverage note, and board count.
O*NET, BEA, WARN, SEC facts, lobbying, USAspending, FEC
Open Data · 4 items
Verified public-data facts are rendered through canonical claims and the evidence appendix.
Evidence behind the dossier: supporting facts, methodology, confidence rationale, filing logs, and exportable rows. Empty sections describe what was reviewed rather than silently disappearing.
Supporting facts(39)
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $39331.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2025
- Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2026): $44062.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q1 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2026): $46743.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q2 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2026): $57006.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q3 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2026): $68127.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2026
- Rule of 40 score: 146.9. Revenue growth 85.2% + FCF margin 61.7%.Computed market metrics · high confidence · 2026-07-22T14:56:17.564Z
- Revenue per employee: $1943K (+58.8% YoY).Computed market metrics · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T14:56:17.564Z
- Insider activity (90d): 7 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 11 equity awards, 5 tax-withholding, 3 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).Form 4 insider activity · medium confidence · 2026-07-22T14:59:29.102Z
- Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $490,431 for the supplied grant.Equity scenario model · high confidence · 2026-07-22T14:56:17.564Z
- 12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 35.8%, max drawdown -20.2%, current drawdown -12%.Historical price model · high confidence · 2026-07-22T14:56:17.564Z
- Nicholas Parker hire: Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-08-24https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000060/nvda-20260628.htm
- Suzanne Nora Johnson hire: member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-07-13https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000028/nvda-20260507.htm
- Donald Robertson retirement: VP, Finance.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-05-04https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000026/nvda-20260424.htm
- Scott Gawel hire: VP and CAO.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-05-04https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000026/nvda-20260424.htm
- Persis Drell departure: Board of Directors.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-01-20https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000003/nvda-20260120.htm
- Board: 10 directors (9/10 independent).Proxy statement board record · medium confidence · 2026https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000036/nvda-20260512.htm
- SEC filing: SC 13G filed 2026-07-20 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-20 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000062/xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xml
- SEC filing: 3 filed 2026-07-15 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-15 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000131026426000002/xslF345X06/wk-form3_1784149389.xml
- SEC filing: 4 filed 2026-07-06 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-06 00:00:00https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764726000005/xslF345X06/wk-form4_1783371701.xml
- Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The focus on AI and infrastructure growth suggests strong future opportunities in these sectors, but ongoing geopolitical and supply chain risks may impact stability.Earnings call transcript · high confidence · 2026-07-22T14:59:29.102Z
Confidence map(8)
- comp_reality · high Section has source-backed facts available.
- leverage · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- leadership_stability · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- three_questions · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- counterfactual · low Counterfactual recommender needs alumni outcomes and peer score generation.
- five_year_forecast · low Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- organizational_diagnosis · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- red_flags · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
Methodology(10)
- Trajectory Score weights organizational health, leadership stability, strategic coherence, alumni outcomes, promotion velocity, skills marketability, and role-specific risk.
- One Number model varies by report mode: NPV for offer evaluation, EV delta for stay-or-go, trajectory percentile for job seekers, CCVI for career trajectory.
- Public-source leadership signals come from SEC 8-K and DEF 14A records when available.
- Leadership coverage: ready. Leadership=ready, board=ready, transitions=ready. 24 role records, 10 board records, 8 transition records.
- Ticker: NVDA. Company: NVIDIA Corporation.
- Offer inputs: base $235,000, equity $320,000.
- No user-contributed tenure aggregates available.
- Cross-section findings are AI-generated from assembled Tier 2 data and validated for multi-section citation.
- Pre-mortem output was generated by Footnote's structured risk model.
- Insider sentiment aggregate was not available for this ticker.
8-K leadership log(8)
[
{
"new_role": "Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000060/nvda-20260628.htm",
"former_role": null,
"person_name": "Nicholas Parker",
"source_quote": "appointed Nicholas Parker, age 55, as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations",
"effective_date": "2026-08-24",
"prior_employer": "Microsoft Corporation",
"transition_type": "hire"
},
{
"new_role": "member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000028/nvda-20260507.htm",
"former_role": null,
"person_name": "Suzanne Nora Johnson",
"source_quote": "appointed Suzanne Nora Johnson as a member of the Board and as a member of the Audit Committee",
"effective_date": "2026-07-13",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "hire"
},
{
"new_role": "VP, Finance",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000026/nvda-20260424.htm",
"former_role": "VP and Chief Accounting Officer",
"person_name": "Donald Robertson",
"source_quote": "intention to retire from his role as VP and CAO",
"effective_date": "2026-05-04",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "retirement"
},
{
"new_role": "VP and CAO",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000026/nvda-20260424.htm",
"former_role": null,
"person_name": "Scott Gawel",
"source_quote": "appointed Scott Gawel, age 55, as VP and CAO",
"effective_date": "2026-05-04",
"prior_employer": "Intel Corporation",
"transition_type": "hire"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000003/nvda-20260120.htm",
"former_role": "Board of Directors",
"person_name": "Persis Drell",
"source_quote": "Persis Drell resigned from the Board of Directors, or the Board, of NVIDIA Corporation",
"effective_date": "2026-01-20",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "departure"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581025000197/nvda-20250731.htm",
"former_role": "Board of Directors member, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member",
"person_name": "Ellen Ochoa",
"source_quote": "Dr. Ochoa’s resignation is for personal reasons",
"effective_date": "2025-08-05",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "departure"
},
{
"new_role": "member of the Board",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581024000300/0001045810-24-000300.txt",
"former_role": null,
"person_name": "Ellen Ochoa",
"source_quote": "Dr. Ochoa is expected to be appointed to serve as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.",
"effective_date": "2024-11-07",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "hire"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000060/nvda-20260628.htm",
"former_role": "Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations",
"person_name": "Ajay K. Puri",
"source_quote": "intention to retire from his role effective upon the employment commencement date of his successor.",
"effective_date": null,
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "retirement"
}
]Insider trading log(100)
[
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000131026426000002/0001310264-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "3",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-07-15",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001310264",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "NORA JOHNSON SUZANNE M",
"securitiesOwned": 2496,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-13",
"transactionType": "",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 0,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": ""
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764726000005/0001197647-26-000005-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-07-06",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197647",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "COXE TENCH",
"securitiesOwned": 25171360,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-01",
"transactionType": "G-Gift",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 500000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000009/0001199039-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 11544612,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000172529226000004/0001725292-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001725292",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Shah Aarti S.",
"securitiesOwned": 37218,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119765226000007/0001197652-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197652",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "SEAWELL A BROOKE",
"securitiesOwned": 7818,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000176867026000004/0001768670-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001768670",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Neal Stephen C",
"securitiesOwned": 5098,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000128411626000004/0001284116-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001284116",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "LORA MELISSA",
"securitiesOwned": 15069,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119765026000002/0001197650-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197650",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "JONES HARVEY C",
"securitiesOwned": 71618,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000121988826000002/0001219888-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001219888",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUDSON DAWN E",
"securitiesOwned": 370098,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000181822426000006/0001818224-26-000006-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001818224",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Dabiri John",
"securitiesOwned": 15374,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764726000003/0001197647-26-000003-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197647",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "COXE TENCH",
"securitiesOwned": 57378,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000007/0001199039-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 209.6952,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 5772886,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-18",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 319385,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000007/0001199039-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 210.4372,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 5207271,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-18",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 565615,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000169684126000008/0001696841-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, General Counsel and Sec",
"reportingCik": "0001696841",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Teter Timothy S.",
"securitiesOwned": 334436,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35742,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000128385426000008/0001283854-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, Operations",
"reportingCik": "0001283854",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Shoquist Debora",
"securitiesOwned": 521755,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35012,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000158867026000012/0001588670-26-000012-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP & Chief Financial Officer",
"reportingCik": "0001588670",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Kress Colette",
"securitiesOwned": 840641,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 40746,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000134784226000013/0001347842-26-000013-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, Worldwide Field Ops",
"reportingCik": "0001347842",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Puri Ajay K",
"securitiesOwned": 600321,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 36927,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764926000010/0001197649-26-000010-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director, officer: President and CEO",
"reportingCik": "0001197649",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUANG JEN HSUN",
"securitiesOwned": 70146252,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 45723,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764926000008/0001197649-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-18",
"typeOfOwner": "director, officer: President and CEO",
"reportingCik": "0001197649",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUANG JEN HSUN",
"securitiesOwned": 468131547,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-16",
"transactionType": "G-Gift",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 400000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000124382126000005/0001243821-26-000005-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-10",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: Principal Accounting Officer",
"reportingCik": "0001243821",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "GAWEL SCOTT",
"securitiesOwned": 59509,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-08",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 13866,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
}
]Transcript pull(6)
“Capital allocation prioritizing R&D and strategic investment · Expanding AI infrastructure and market share · Growing share in the inference market · Developing and deploying Vera CPU for agentic AI”
Investment priority“While we are not immune to supply challenges, we remain confident in our ability to support the growth opportunity ahead.”
Stated risk · Supply Chain Challenges“We are not including any China data center compute revenue in our outlook.”
Stated risk · China Market Uncertainty“We will make investments necessary to deliver the industry's lowest cost per token.”
Investment priority · R&D“We are on track to commence production shipments of VeraRubin in the second half of this year.”
Investment priority · Ecosystem Development“We are also announcing an $80 billion share repurchase authorization.”
Investment priority · Share Repurchases
Glossary(4)
- 8-K
- SEC current report used for material company events, including executive appointments and departures.
- DEF 14A
- Definitive proxy statement containing board, governance, and executive disclosure.
- Trajectory Score
- Footnote's 0-100 estimate of career value and risk for a role/company decision.
- K-anonymity
- Privacy threshold that suppresses aggregate user-contributed metrics until enough contributors exist.
Export preview
CSV preview — first 10 rows of 39, exactly as the download serializes them.
id,claim,value,source_type,confidence fact_001,Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $39331.0M.,39331000000,fmp_financials,high fact_002,Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2026): $44062.0M.,44062000000,fmp_financials,high fact_003,Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2026): $46743.0M.,46743000000,fmp_financials,high fact_004,Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2026): $57006.0M.,57006000000,fmp_financials,high fact_005,Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2026): $68127.0M.,68127000000,fmp_financials,high fact_006,Rule of 40 score: 146.9. Revenue growth 85.2% + FCF margin 61.7%.,146.9,derived_fmp,high fact_007,Revenue per employee: $1943K (+58.8% YoY).,1943214,derived_fmp,medium fact_008,"Insider activity (90d): 7 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 11 equity awards, 5 tax-withholding, 3 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).",1,fmp_insider_trading,medium fact_009,"Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $490,431 for the supplied grant.",490431,derived_equity_scenario,high fact_010,"12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 35.8%, max drawdown -20.2%, current drawdown -12%.",'-20.2,derived_price_history,high
JSON export contents (keys): facts, sections
Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get the Offer Brief — $49See all four brief tiers