Subject company
NVIDIA Corporation
Senior Silicon Design Engineer · IC5 · Santa Clara, CA
Take the offer; negotiate from strength on RSU grant size and vesting structure. Base is at ceiling — direct all negotiation energy toward increasing the $320,000 RSU grant by 10–15% or securing an accelerated first-year cliff, both of which are defensible given the candidate's tapeout track record and NVIDIA's $1.94M revenue-per-employee.
NVIDIA Corporation: Structurally strong offer at the 89th percentile base — primary value creation sits in equity negotiation, not salary.
Offer vesting schedule
Web and Digital Interface Designers · Level III · California
This offer’s base sits at the 89th percentile — near the top of the market band.
Your base: $235,000 · $24,190 above the P75 mark — this band is a floor under you, not a ceiling
Source: DOL OFLC LCA disclosure data · n=87 certified filings · base cash only (excludes equity and bonus). Use as a citable market floor, not total compensation.
The negotiation room this brief is built to unlock — typically many multiples of its price. The lever-by-lever play is in the negotiation playbook below.
Strong
company trajectory · high confidence
5-year expected total comp (probability-weighted NPV)
What to do next
Start here. This section compresses the brief into the decision, the strongest reasons behind it, and the risks that deserve verification before you sign.
Why the verdict landed here
Financial context grounds organizational health.
SEC leadership events and board data inform stability.
Offer details enable compensation modeling.
SEC executive transition records inform talent-flow signals.
What to verify before signing
Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Signals we only see when the data is connected
Insider selling with zero buys undermines the base-case RSU valuation: the $320K grant may be worth materially less than the linear-vesting projection assumes
Negotiation leverage + Company quality · medium confidence
The pre-mortem scenario of role collapse into sustaining engineering is directly enabled by the EVP Puri retirement and CAO transition — two leadership vacancies that leave the IC5 hire with no confirmed chain of ownership over the Vera or post-Blackwell program
Risks + Leadership and stability + Questions to ask · medium confidence
The 42% headcount surge over two years, combined with the disappearance of Sovereign AI and Networking Solutions as strategic themes, raises the probability that this IC5 seat is backfill or program-agnostic growth rather than a named next-generation architecture role — directly contradicting the five-year forecast's base-case trajectory
Career upside + Company quality + Questions to ask · medium confidence
The $11.23M lobbying spend concentrated in trade and defense issue codes, combined with the bear-case export-control trigger, means the equity component of this offer carries geopolitical tail risk that the comp analysis does not price in — a new China accelerator restriction could reprice the RSU grant before the first-year cliff
Offer economics + Risks + Company quality · medium confidence
Unlock 3 more signals only Footnote connects
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get your brief — $199See all four brief tiersScore components
Bar color: strong (65+) · moderate (45–64) · weak (<45)
Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get your brief — $199See all four brief tiersThe decision rule
Accept-leaningDerived from this brief’s own numbers — the band placement, company operating quality, and role exposure — not model judgment. The same rule fixes the verdict above.
- Base $235,000 sits at the 89th percentile of the base-cash market band (median $183,227).
- Company operating quality is strong (Rule of 40: 146.9).
- Comp is already placed above market — protect it; negotiate scope, level, or refresh terms instead of base.
- The equity-weighted package stays ≥ 1.5× the base-cash median (currently 3.4×).
- Equity is the swing factor — confirm the refresh policy and vest mechanics before relying on the headline number.
- Verification surfaces a dealbreaker (§5 questions) — scope, level, or team stability materially worse than represented.
Alumni outcomes require optional user-contributed career data and confidence thresholds.
What the offer is really worth
This translates the package into realized value, equity risk, market benchmarks, and concrete negotiation room.
Market consensus
A compact read on whether public-market expectations support the equity story behind the offer.
Keybanc: maintain
Jul 14, 2026 · Overweight → Overweight
Needham: maintain
Jun 02, 2026 · Buy → Buy
DA Davidson: maintain
Jun 01, 2026 · Buy → Buy
Tigress Financial: maintain
May 27, 2026 · Strong Buy → Strong Buy
The $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the DOL H-1B/LCA California band (median $183,227, n=87), so base is effectively at ceiling for this market anchor — the negotiation surface is almost entirely on the $320,000 RSU grant, where a 10–15% increase to $352,000–$368,000 is defensible given the candidate's three shipped GPU/accelerator tapeouts, a staff-level title at Tenstorrent immediately prior, and NVDA's $1.94M revenue-per-employee (58.8% YoY growth) which signals the company is extracting exceptional value from each engineering seat. The $60,000 signing bonus is a one-time offset for unvested equity left at Tenstorrent — if that forfeiture exceeds $60K, that gap is the cleanest, least-confrontational ask: 'My unvested Tenstorrent equity forfeiture is approximately $X; can we close that gap in the signing bonus or front-load the first-year RSU tranche?' Do not negotiate base; negotiate grant size and signing. Equity scenarios use rsu linear and show 137.8% spread across available public valuation anchors.
Evidence confidence: high
Base already at 89th percentile — push equity: Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California DOL H-1B/LCA band (median $183,227, n=87), meaning base is effectively tapped out relative to market. The real negotiation surface is the $320,000 RSU grant — at a company generating $1.94M revenue per employee and a 61.7% FCF margin, NVIDIA has structural capacity to grant more equity without moving the needle on its comp-to-revenue ratio (SBC/revenue TTM: 2.7%). Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs and frame it as aligning your grant to the productivity economics of the role, not a base adjustment.
Evidence confidence: medium
Vera CPU TAM opens new silicon headcount demand: On the most recent earnings call, management explicitly stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before.' Entering a net-new CPU architecture requires a significant ramp in silicon design talent — precisely your RTL-through-tapeout profile across GPU and accelerator SoCs. That demand signal gives you standing to argue for a higher IC level or a larger initial grant, since NVIDIA is competing for a scarce pool of engineers who can execute on novel microarchitecture from day one.
Evidence confidence: medium
Signing bonus is strong but structurally one-time: The $60,000 signing bonus is meaningful but disappears after year one; your effective year-1 package is $615,000, dropping to $535,000 in year two once the cliff vests and signing is gone. Given NVDA's 85.2% revenue growth YoY and $49B in free cash flow cited in the most recent quarter, the company is not capital-constrained. A credible counter is to request that $30,000–$40,000 of the signing be converted into incremental RSUs — this converts a one-time cash outflow for NVIDIA into a retention instrument and raises your steady-state annual value without touching base.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVIDIA's named executive officers are compensated almost entirely through RSU stock awards: CEO Jen-Hsun Huang received $49.9M total in FY2025 with $38.8M in stock awards and a $1.49M base salary; EVP-level officers (Kress, Puri, Shoquist, Teter) ranged from $14.3M to $21.6M total, each with stock awards comprising 85–92% of total comp and base salaries between $848K and $948K. No option awards appear in any disclosed row — NVIDIA's executive comp architecture is pure RSU, which is the same vehicle being offered to this candidate, confirming the equity-heavy structure is firm-wide policy rather than a negotiating concession.
From proxy-statement compensation records.
The 90-day insider transaction window shows 7 open-market sells and 0 open-market buys among NVIDIA insiders (11 equity awards and 5 tax-withholding rows excluded as non-discretionary); the sustained_selling pattern at high classifier confidence reflects routine diversification from a stock up 21.5% over 12 months and sitting at a $207.40 price, not a signal of deteriorating conviction — no insider has filed a 10b5-1 termination or accelerated an unusual block sale. The vesting overlap analysis found no material conflict between insider sell windows and the candidate's proposed vest schedule, which is a constructive signal for RSU value realization.
Pattern read derived from Form 4 filing data.
Comp waterfall
Headline package versus the modeled value after the first vesting cliff.
It separates advertised compensation from what is actually exposed to vesting timing.
Anchor negotiation around the gap between headline value and first-year realized value.
Equity scenarios
Cliff risk: leave before the first vesting cliff and realized equity is $0 — the bear case is not the floor. Weigh signing cash accordingly.
Bear, base, and bull public-market anchors for the equity grant.
RSU value is not fixed. A strong offer can still carry material downside if the stock resets.
Ask for equity refresh protection, a higher grant, or signing cash if downside exposure is high.
Directional public-market anchors — not company-specific exec comp or your offer.
California · n=87 · offer at 89th pct
- P10
- $136,000
- P25
- $159,432
- Median
- $183,227
- P75
- $210,810
- P90
- $237,762
Base cash only (year) — excludes equity and bonus.
BLS OEWS floor — Web and Digital Interface Designers, California (state OEWS) (2025): median $136,110. Government survey median; a conservative floor, not the role-and-metro market the band above reflects.
Peer tickers are selected from public market data and filings — use as directional context, not a compensation survey.
Growing — new sponsored-hire approvals rose in the latest complete fiscal year. Denial rate across the window: 0.7%. Still actively attesting: 1,872 certified LCA filings in FY2025 — the freshest read on sponsorship intent, ahead of the slower petition record.
Petition approvals from the federal record — counts of approvals, not people; one person can hold multiple petitions across years. LCA filings are attestations, not hires. A fiscal year marked “prelim.” is still being published by USCIS and is left out of the trend. Read the trend, not the absolute size.
Whether the company can support the promise
This is the company-health read behind the offer: growth quality, operating discipline, market risk, and whether the financial base supports the compensation ask.
Where product revenue comes from
Data Center
Gaming
Professional Visualization
Latest reported segmentation FY · USD.
Where geographic revenue comes from
UNITED STATES
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA
CHINA
Latest reported segmentation FY · USD.
Financial score read
Scores are treated as a screening signal only; they support, not replace, the operating metrics above.
Recent events that change the read
TSMC Just Announced Fantastic News for Nvidia Shareholders
The $1,000 Hidden Tax on Every $10,000 Invested in This NVIDIA ETF
Investors Can't Shake AI Bubble Fears—But They're Not Dropping Their Favorite Tech Stocks
Source feeds are filtered to a short materiality read; the brief avoids raw news-feed dumps.
Strong
This connects transcript strategy, operating metrics, and offer timing. A coherent company story strengthens equity confidence; drift or mixed messaging shifts emphasis toward cash certainty and explicit role scope.
This offer is structurally strong: base of $235,000 sits at the 89th percentile of the California H-1B/LCA market band (median $183,227, n=87), and the $615,000 headline package — base plus $320,000 RSU grant plus $60,000 signing — is 3.4× that base-cash median, though the band excludes equity and bonus so the comparison is not apples-to-apples. NVIDIA's fundamentals support the equity component: revenue grew 85.2% YoY to $81.6B in Q1 FY2027, FCF margin runs at 61.7%, and the Rule of 40 score of 146.9 is among the highest in large-cap semiconductors, giving the RSUs a credible base-case value of ~$490,584 under linear vesting at current prices. The primary negotiation angle is equity quantity, not base — with 7 open-market insider sells and zero buys in the last 90 days and annualized stock volatility of 35.8%, pushing for a larger RSU grant or an accelerated cliff (e.g., 25% at 12 months rather than a hard one-year cliff) is the highest-leverage ask given your tapeout-to-ship track record across three GPU/accelerator programs.
Evidence confidence: medium
Rule of 40 score 147 — revenue growth 85.2% plus FCF margin 61.7%.
Evidence confidence: high
Annualized volatility 35.8%; max 12-month drawdown -20.2%; current drawdown -12%.
Evidence confidence: high
Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The strategic narrative shows consistent themes around AI infrastructure and growth, with some new areas of focus emerging.
Evidence confidence: high
Consistent themes across quarters: AI Infrastructure Growth, Agentic AI Development, Geopolitical Issues.
Evidence confidence: high
At $235,000 base, this offer sits at the 89th percentile of the California base-cash market band (median $183,227, n=87 H-1B/LCA filings), meaning NVIDIA has already priced the role above where most competing offers clear — negotiate from that position, not from a deficit. The $615,000 headline package is 3.4× the base-cash median, though that multiple reflects $320,000 in RSUs and a $60,000 signing bonus that the band excludes, so the comparison is apples-to-oranges by design and should be cited as context, not compression. NVIDIA's Rule of 40 of 146.9, 85.2% revenue growth YoY, and 61.7% FCF margin confirm the equity is backed by a business generating real cash at scale — the base RSU scenario values the grant at $490,584 over four years, with a bull case of $509,161, making the primary negotiation lever additional equity refresh cadence or an accelerated cliff, not base salary.
Evidence confidence: medium
SEC leadership records alumni reference: 3 executive transitions; top buckets: other (2), departure (1).
Evidence confidence: medium
Bear: NVIDIA files an 8-K or issues a press release announcing additional U.S. export control restrictions on H20, B20, or any successor accelerator SKU targeting China — monitor SEC EDGAR 8-K filings and BIS Federal Register notices monthly, as each incremental restriction directly compresses the Data….
Evidence confidence: medium
In their own words
Verbatim from the latest earnings call — management’s stated risks and investment priorities, unedited.
“While we are not immune to supply challenges, we remain confident.”
“We are uncertain whether any imports will be allowed into the country.”
“We will make investments necessary to deliver the industry's lowest cost per token.”
“We are in every hyperscale cloud.”
Rule of 40
Growth plus margin clears the 40 line — the company is growing with discipline, not buying growth with weak margins. That strengthens the case for equity.
Revenue growth and free-cash-flow margin combined into an operating-quality score.
It gives a quick read on whether growth is disciplined or being bought with weak margins.
Use a strong score as support for a stronger equity or refresh ask.
Cash runway
Profitable or cash-generating — runway gauge not applicable
How many quarters of cash coverage the company appears to have.
Cash stress changes negotiation posture and role risk.
If runway is thin, prefer cash/signing certainty over back-loaded equity.
Revenue per employee
Latest revenue productivity per employee from company financial and headcount data.
High productivity supports premium compensation; weak productivity can foreshadow cost pressure.
Use strong productivity as support for a strategic-hire compensation argument.
Analyst targets versus price
Current price against low, median, and high analyst target anchors.
It frames whether the market already prices in most of the upside.
Use wide dispersion as a reason to derisk vesting or ask for more shares.
Market cap trend
Recent company valuation trend from public market data.
It contextualizes equity timing and whether the offer arrives after a run-up or reset.
Pair this with stock-risk metrics before accepting equity-heavy compensation.
What could make this role better or worse than it looks
This section turns leadership, insider, board, and market signals into career-risk context for the role you are considering.
0 = insulated · 100 = high · a separate read from company health
Your role looks well-insulated on the public signals available.
Company revenue is up 108% across the available quarters, which lowers role exposure at the company level.
3 executive departures in the last 12 months. · source
Public court records, aggregated at the employer level. Individual parties are not shown; the docket links go to the primary source.
named as defendant in 20 trade secret / IP cases (most recent 2026-06-22).
Concluded U.S. DOL Wage & Hour cases, matched to this employer by name and aggregated. A clean record here is not a guarantee; a case filed under a differently-spelled entity may not be captured.
1 concluded U.S. DOL Wage & Hour case on record (most recent findings 2024-04-29).
Limitations
No Item 2.05 restructuring 8-Ks matched this employer in the lookback window.
No WARN notices matched (coverage is strongest in CA and NY).
No public ATS board is mapped for this employer, so hiring velocity is unavailable.
Public court-records lookup degraded this run — litigation posture may be incomplete.
Segment-level revenue is rarely disclosed; the revenue signal uses the company total as a proxy.
Vest timing check
No material insider sale overlap was detected around modeled vest milestones.
Confidence: medium
Largest holder pressure
CHICAGO TRUST CO NA
Position size unavailable
JOHNSON BIXBY & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Position size unavailable
PFG ADVISORS
Position size unavailable
HENGEHOLD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
Position size unavailable
Congressional trading
7 recent symbol-matched disclosure row(s), with 3 buy-like and 4 sell-like transaction(s).
Sheldon Whitehouse · Sale · $15,001 - $50,000
Ro Khanna · Purchase · $1,001 - $15,000
Ro Khanna · Purchase · $1,001 - $15,000
Leadership graph (resolved): Suzanne Nora Johnson — member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee; Donald F. Robertson Jr. — Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer; Ajay K. Puri — Executive Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations; Chris A. Malachowsky — Co-Founder; Jen-Hsun Huang — Co-Founder, CEO & Director; Colette Kress — Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer; Timothy S. Teter — Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary; Toshiya Hari — Vice President of Investor Relations & Strategic Finance; Alison Berkley Wagonfeld — Chief Marketing Officer; Mylene Mangalindan — Vice President of Corporate Communications; Scott C. Gawel — Chief Accounting Officer; Debora Shoquist — Executive Vice President of Operations
Evidence confidence: medium
Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).
Evidence confidence: medium
Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).
Evidence confidence: medium
Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).
Evidence confidence: medium
Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).
Evidence confidence: medium
You joined NVIDIA in September 2026 as an IC5 Senior Silicon Design Engineer on what you believed was a ground-up next-generation architecture program, but by March 2028 the role had collapsed into sustaining engineering on Blackwell derivatives — bug fixes, ECO cycles, and yield-improvement iterations — with no meaningful RTL ownership. The Vera CPU program, which was the stated rationale for your team's headcount expansion, slipped its internal tapeout milestone by two quarters due to TSMC 2nm capacity constraints and a mid-program pivot in the memory subsystem architecture, effectively freezing IC5-level design assignments and funneling all novel work to a small group of IC6 principals who had been on the project since inception. With your Tenstorrent unvested equity already forfeited, the $60,000 signing bonus clawback period expired but the RSU grant — priced at $207.40 — is now worth 40% less than at grant due to a sustained NVDA drawdown triggered by U.S. export control tightening on H20/B20 derivatives to China, and the equity refresh you were promised at the 12-month mark came in at $80,000, not the $150,000+ you modeled, because the company-wide refresh pool was compressed after revenue growth decelerated from 85% to sub-20% YoY as hyperscaler capex cycles normalized.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVIDIA files an 8-K or issues a press release announcing additional U.S. export control restrictions on H20, B20, or any successor accelerator SKU targeting China — monitor SEC EDGAR 8-K filings and BIS Federal Register notices monthly, as each incremental restriction directly compresses the Data…
Evidence confidence: medium
The Vera CPU program misses its publicly telegraphed 'new $200 billion TAM' milestone language in two consecutive earnings calls — if Jensen stops citing Vera by name in the FY2027 Q3 or Q4 transcript, the program has likely slipped internally and your team's design scope will contract toward…
Evidence confidence: medium
Leadership tape
Source-backed leadership facts are used conservatively; unresolved or sparse records are omitted from user-facing claims.
Suzanne Nora Johnson
2026-07-13hire: role → member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee
“appointed Suzanne Nora Johnson as a member of the Board and as a member of the Audit Committee”
Donald Robertson
2026-05-04retirement: VP and Chief Accounting Officer → VP, Finance
“notified the Company of his intention to retire from his role as VP and CAO, effective May 4, 2026”
Persis Drell
2026-01-20departure: Board of Directors → role
“Persis Drell resigned from the Board of Directors, or the Board, of NVIDIA Corporation”
Ajay K. Puri
date pendingretirement: Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations → role
“notified the Company of his intention to retire from his role”
Coverage note
Insider intensity
Form 4 buy/sell activity summarized by month.
Heavy selling does not automatically mean distress, but it changes how much equity risk you should accept.
Use sustained selling as support for vest protection or more cash.
Institutional ownership
6,234 institutional holders (latest 13F)
Top ETF weight in fund
Institutional ownership concentration and ETF exposure.
Ownership mix can amplify volatility and market sensitivity.
Treat concentrated ownership as another reason to stress-test equity-heavy offers.
How to use the brief in the conversation
This is the action layer: the asks to prioritize, the scripts to use, the questions to ask, and the dealbreakers to monitor.
Your base at $235,000 is already well above what the market pays for this role in California, so the real conversation is about equity — and that's exactly where NVIDIA has room to move. Open by expressing genuine enthusiasm for the role and the team, then make one clean ask: bring the RSU grant from $320,000 to $370,000. That's your primary number. Don't lead with base, don't stack multiple requests in the first breath — just the equity ask, stated plainly, with a single reason and a collaborative close.
Your counter, lever by lever
At $235,000, the base sits at the 89th percentile of the California DOL H-1B/LCA market band (median $183,227, p75 $210,810, n=87). There is effectively no credible market argument to push base materially higher — the floor and target are both $235,000. Hold base as a concession card only: if NVIDIA cannot move equity, you can ask them to confirm base is firm rather than offering to trade it down.
computed room, anchored to DOL market p75 (floor at market median)
The $320,000 RSU grant is the primary negotiation surface. The target is $370,000 — a $50,000 increase — anchored to three facts: NVIDIA generates $1.94M in revenue per employee with a 61.7% FCF margin, making incremental RSU grants structurally low-cost for the company; the stock entered your grant window at a -12% drawdown with 35.8% annualized volatility, creating real entry-point timing risk that a larger grant partially offsets; and your RTL-through-tapeout ownership on three shipped GPU/accelerator programs, including block team lead on a datacenter part, represents scope that maps to IC6 at most semiconductor companies. Floor is $320,000 — do not accept less than the original grant.
computed equity room
The $60,000 signing bonus is strong, but it is a one-time payment that disappears after year one, dropping your steady-state package from $615,000 to $535,000. The target here is actually additive: ask for an incremental $12,000 in signing (to $72,000) only as a fallback if NVIDIA cannot move the RSU grant — frame it as bridging the gap between year-one and year-two economics. Do not lead with signing; it is the consolation lever, not the primary ask. Also confirm clawback terms in writing before signing anything — specifically whether the provision is cliff-based or pro-rated, and whether it applies if the company initiates a separation.
one-time bridge sized to the base gap (use if they cannot move base)
Your current title at Tenstorrent is Staff Engineer — one level above Senior at most semiconductor companies — and you have demonstrated block team lead ownership on a datacenter SoC tapeout. NVIDIA's IC5 maps to Senior; IC6 is Staff/Principal. If the recruiter cannot move the RSU grant to $370,000, ask for a leveling review before you sign: a confirmed IC6 designation typically carries $40,000–$80,000 in incremental grant value and improves your equity refresh trajectory in years two through four. Frame this as a calibration question, not a demand — you want to make sure the leveling rubric was reviewed against your full tapeout record.
non-cash lever: leveling, scope, and equity-refresh cadence
Scripts
When they push back
“Your base is already above our band for this level — we don't have room to move it.”
That makes complete sense, and honestly I'm not asking you to move base — I think the base is fair. The ask I'm making is entirely on the equity side. Can we focus the conversation there?
“The RSU grant was set based on your level and our internal equity bands.”
I understand, and I'm not trying to work around your process. I'd just ask — was the leveling reviewed against my full tapeout record? I've led a block team through tapeout on a datacenter part, which at a lot of companies maps to a Staff or Principal level. If there's a case for a level review, that might be the cleaner path to get to $370,000 on the grant.
“We don't typically negotiate equity — the grant is set at the time of offer.”
I hear you, and I know that's the norm in a lot of cases. I'll just say honestly — equity is where the long-term alignment lives for me, and the market data I've seen for this scope of role suggests there's a gap worth closing. Even a modest increase to $370,000 would make this a very easy yes. Is there any path to take that back to the team?
“We can look at the signing bonus but not the RSU grant.”
I appreciate that — and I'll take it. If the grant can't move, could we bring the signing to $72,000? My package steps down in year two once the signing is gone, and that would help bridge that gap while I'm building into the vest.
“We need an answer by end of week — can you commit?”
I want to commit — I really do want this role. I just want to make sure we've had a chance to close the equity conversation first, because that's the one thing I'd regret not asking about. Can we get a quick answer on the $370,000 RSU ask by Thursday? If yes, I'll sign same day.
“I have a lot of respect for NVIDIA and for the time everyone's invested in this process — if we're not able to find a path to $370,000 on the RSU grant or an equivalent adjustment, I may need to stay where I am, but I'd genuinely welcome the chance to revisit this if circumstances change.”
Targets are computed from your offer and a 5% base / 15% equity negotiation-room estimate; anchored to the DOL LCA market band for California, where your base sits at roughly the 89th percentile; They are derived deterministically, not written by the model.
Who to talk to — and in what order
Comp lives with different people than you think. Aim each ask at the person who can actually move it.
Owns the offer number and can move base / signing within a set band.
Your first channel. Make the case here: give them the market floor and one clear, specific ask. Stay warm — they're your messenger, not your obstacle.
Owns level, scope, and the business case for hiring you.
Your advocate. Loop them in for a level bump, equity, or when the recruiter says the band is fixed — they can request an exception the recruiter can't.
Sets the salary bands; rarely negotiates with you directly.
You almost never talk to them. But the hiring manager can push an out-of-band exception up to them — which is why winning the manager matters.
When they say “this is our final offer”
- 01
“Final” is usually a close, not a wall. Stay gracious, restate your value in one line, and make a single specific, justified ask — not a list.
- 02
If base is capped, trade levers: pivot to a signing bonus, an equity refresh, an accelerated first review, or a title/level adjustment.
- 03
Only invoke a deadline or competing interest if it's real. A bluff that gets called costs you leverage and goodwill.
- 04
Give them an easy yes: name the one thing that turns a maybe into a signature today.
“I really want to make this work — I’m ready to sign. The one thing that would let me say yes today is [specific ask]. Is there any room there?”
Base already at 89th percentile — push equity
Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California DOL H-1B/LCA band (median $183,227, n=87), meaning base is effectively tapped out relative to market. The real negotiation surface is the $320,000 RSU grant — at a company generating $1.94M revenue per employee and a 61.7% FCF margin, NVIDIA has structural capacity to grant more equity without moving the needle on its comp-to-revenue ratio (SBC/revenue TTM: 2.7%). Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs and frame it as aligning your grant to the productivity economics of the role, not a base adjustment.
Evidence anchor: DOL H-1B/LCA California band (n=87); NVDA computed metrics (revenue/employee $1,943,214; FCF margin 61.7%; SBC/revenue 2.7% TTM)
Vera CPU TAM opens new silicon headcount demand
On the most recent earnings call, management explicitly stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before.' Entering a net-new CPU architecture requires a significant ramp in silicon design talent — precisely your RTL-through-tapeout profile across GPU and accelerator SoCs. That demand signal gives you standing to argue for a higher IC level or a larger initial grant, since NVIDIA is competing for a scarce pool of engineers who can execute on novel microarchitecture from day one.
Evidence anchor: NVDA FY2027 Q1 earnings transcript (strategic priorities); GRAPH CONTEXT leadership/transition data
Signing bonus is strong but structurally one-time
The $60,000 signing bonus is meaningful but disappears after year one; your effective year-1 package is $615,000, dropping to $535,000 in year two once the cliff vests and signing is gone. Given NVDA's 85.2% revenue growth YoY and $49B in free cash flow cited in the most recent quarter, the company is not capital-constrained. A credible counter is to request that $30,000–$40,000 of the signing be converted into incremental RSUs — this converts a one-time cash outflow for NVIDIA into a retention instrument and raises your steady-state annual value without touching base.
Evidence anchor: Computed metrics (revenue growth YoY 85.2%; FCF $49B per earnings transcript); offer details (signing $60,000, vest 4y cliff 1y)
Insider selling pattern warrants equity acceleration ask
SEC Form 4 filings show 7 open-market sells and 0 open-market buys among insiders over the trailing 90 days (non-discretionary awards and tax-withholding rows excluded). This is a sustained_selling pattern, not a panic signal, but it does indicate insiders are reducing exposure at current prices. The stock is also in a -12% drawdown from its 52-week high with annualized volatility of 35.8%. Use this to justify requesting an accelerated vesting schedule — specifically, a 3-year vest with monthly vesting after a 6-month cliff rather than the standard 4-year annual cliff — to reduce your exposure to price drift over the grant window.
Evidence anchor: SEC Form 4 filings (NVDA, June–July 2026); computed metrics (annualized volatility 35.8%, current drawdown -12%, insider pattern sustained_selling)
Tenstorrent Staff title supports IC5+ level argument
Your current title at Tenstorrent is Staff Engineer — one level above Senior at most semiconductor companies — and you bring RTL-through-tapeout ownership on three shipped GPU/accelerator programs including block team lead on a datacenter part. NVIDIA's IC5 maps to Senior; IC6 is Staff/Principal. If the offer is IC5, there is a factual basis to request a level review before signing: your demonstrated scope (6-engineer block lead, datacenter SoC tapeout) aligns with IC6 criteria, and a level bump at NVIDIA typically carries $40,000–$80,000 in incremental RSU grant value. Frame this as a calibration conversation, not a renegotiation — ask the recruiter to confirm the leveling rubric was reviewed against your tapeout record.
Evidence anchor: Candidate resume (Tenstorrent Staff Engineer, block team lead, 3 shipped programs); NVDA IC-level comp structure (industry standard for semiconductor IC ladders)
Questions they cannot fake
- 1
The offer letter shows $320,000 in RSUs vesting over four years at a $207.40 grant price. NVDA's annualized volatility is 35.8% and the stock is currently 12% off its recent high. Can you confirm the grant date and price used to calculate the share count, and whether NVIDIA refreshes equity annually for IC5s — and at what typical cadence and size relative to the initial grant?
The bear/base/bull equity scenarios span $214,156 to $509,161 depending on where NVDA trades at vest. Knowing the exact share count locked in at grant, plus the refresh cadence, is the single largest variable in your four-year realized comp. NVIDIA's SBC-to-revenue ratio is 2.7%, which signals disciplined equity issuance — refreshes are real but not automatic. You need the mechanics in writing before you sign.
- 2
NVIDIA's headcount grew from 29,600 to 42,000 between FY2024 and FY2026 — a 42% increase in two years. Where does this IC5 role sit in that growth wave: is it a net-new headcount position tied to a specific program like Vera or Blackwell, or a backfill? And what is the expected team size and reporting structure at start?
A role created to staff a named program (Vera CPU opens a stated $200B TAM per the earnings transcript) carries different scope and visibility than a backfill. Program-attached roles at a company growing revenue per employee at 58.8% YoY tend to have faster promotion cycles. The answer also tells you whether the IC5 band is the ceiling or the floor for this seat.
- 3
The $60,000 signing bonus — is it structured as a lump sum on day one, or split across the first year? And what is the clawback period and repayment schedule if I leave before the end of that window?
At a September 15 start date, a split signing structure could mean you don't see the full $60,000 until mid-2027. More importantly, the clawback terms determine your actual optionality: if the full amount is recoverable for 24 months, your effective year-one exit cost is $60,000 on top of unvested equity. You need the exact repayment schedule before treating the signing as liquid.
- 4
NVIDIA's most recent 10-K discloses that EVP Ajay Puri has announced a pending retirement, and the Chief Accounting Officer transitioned roles in April 2026. For this IC5 position, who is the hiring manager and what is the stability of the leadership chain above that person — specifically, has the VP or director over this team been in seat for more than 18 months?
Leadership transitions at the VP/director level directly affect IC5 promotion timing, project assignment, and performance review outcomes. With 4 leadership transitions logged in the past 14 months at the executive level, it is worth confirming that the immediate management chain is stable before your September 15 start date. This is not a red flag question — it is a due-diligence question that signals you read the filings.
Dealbreakers to watch
Equity grant priced at a -12% drawdown — downside scenario is material
mediumNVDA closed at $207.40, already -12% off its recent high and carrying 35.8% annualized volatility. The bear-case equity scenario values your $320,000 RSU grant at $214,156 (vs. $490,584 base case) — a $106,000 swing from grant value. With a 4-year linear vest and a September 2026 start, your first meaningful liquidity event is roughly Q4 2027. The stock needs to recover ~14% just to get back to recent highs before your shares appreciate. This is not a reason to decline, but it is a reason to negotiate the grant size up: ask for $360,000–$380,000 in RSUs to build in a buffer against entry-point timing risk. Frame it as grant-date pricing, not stock skepticism.
Source: Computed equity scenarios (bear=$214,156 at $138.80, base=$490,584 at $317.96, bull=$509,161 at $330); stock metrics: annualized volatility 35.8%, current drawdown -12%, max drawdown -20.2%
Sustained insider selling with zero open-market buys in the last 90 days
mediumSeven open-market sells and zero open-market buys from insiders in the trailing 90 days (11 equity awards and 5 tax-withholding rows excluded as non-discretionary). This is not a fire alarm — executives at a $5T market cap routinely diversify — but the pattern is one-directional. Combined with the stock sitting -12% off highs, it suggests insiders are not adding exposure at current prices. For a candidate whose compensation is ~52% equity by grant value, this is worth noting as a sentiment data point, not a veto signal.
Source ↗ · SEC Form 4 filings, 90-day insider transaction pattern: 7 open-market sells / 0 open-market buys (strength: high); filings dated 2026-06-29 through 2026-07-06Senior field operations EVP retirement pending — org structure in transition
mediumAjay K. Puri, EVP of Worldwide Field Operations, has announced a pending retirement per an 8-K filed 2026-06-28. Additionally, Donald Robertson retired as VP and Chief Accounting Officer in April 2026, and board member Persis Drell departed in January 2026. Three senior-level transitions in under 12 months is an elevated rate for a company of NVIDIA's stability profile. For a silicon design IC5 hire, the direct impact is low — but field ops leadership transitions can affect how design priorities get communicated to customers and fed back into roadmap decisions. Ask your hiring manager which product line your block work feeds and whether that roadmap has been reaffirmed post-transition.
Source ↗ · SEC 8-K filed 2026-06-28 (Puri retirement); SEC filing 2026-04-24 (Robertson transition); SEC 8-K filed 2026-01-20 (Drell departure)Signing bonus is 25.5% of base — confirm clawback terms before signing
lowThe $60,000 signing bonus represents 25.5% of your $235,000 base. NVIDIA's standard offer letters typically include a 12-month clawback provision requiring repayment if you leave voluntarily before the anniversary. With a September 2026 start, that clawback window runs through September 2027 — which is also before your first meaningful RSU vest under a 4-year linear schedule. Confirm in writing: (1) whether the clawback is pro-rated or cliff-based, (2) whether it applies if NVIDIA initiates a layoff, and (3) whether it offsets against unvested equity. If the clawback is cliff-based and non-reciprocal, negotiate either a pro-rated structure or a higher RSU grant to compensate for the asymmetric risk in year one.
Source: Offer details: signing $60,000, base $235,000, RSU vest 4-year linear; standard NVIDIA offer letter structure (candidate-reported)
Pre-mortem: what would make this offer fail
These are the brief’s highest-friction warnings converted into diligence prompts before you sign.
- 1
Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- 2
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
- 3
Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- 4
Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Canonical action signals
Base already at 89th percentile — push equity: Your $235,000 base sits at the 89th percentile of the California DOL H-1B/LCA band (median $183,227, n=87), meaning base is effectively tapped out relative to market. The real negotiation surface is the $320,000 RSU grant — at a company generating $1.94M revenue per employee and a 61.7% FCF margin, NVIDIA has structural capacity to grant more equity without moving the needle on its comp-to-revenue ratio (SBC/revenue TTM: 2.7%). Ask for $400,000–$420,000 in RSUs and frame it as aligning your grant to the productivity economics of the role, not a base adjustment.
Evidence confidence: medium
Vera CPU TAM opens new silicon headcount demand: On the most recent earnings call, management explicitly stated that Vera 'opens a brand new $200 billion TAM for NVIDIA, a market we have never addressed before.' Entering a net-new CPU architecture requires a significant ramp in silicon design talent — precisely your RTL-through-tapeout profile across GPU and accelerator SoCs. That demand signal gives you standing to argue for a higher IC level or a larger initial grant, since NVIDIA is competing for a scarce pool of engineers who can execute on novel microarchitecture from day one.
Evidence confidence: medium
Signing bonus is strong but structurally one-time: The $60,000 signing bonus is meaningful but disappears after year one; your effective year-1 package is $615,000, dropping to $535,000 in year two once the cliff vests and signing is gone. Given NVDA's 85.2% revenue growth YoY and $49B in free cash flow cited in the most recent quarter, the company is not capital-constrained. A credible counter is to request that $30,000–$40,000 of the signing be converted into incremental RSUs — this converts a one-time cash outflow for NVIDIA into a retention instrument and raises your steady-state annual value without touching base.
Evidence confidence: medium
The offer letter shows $320,000 in RSUs vesting over four years at a $207.40 grant price. NVDA's annualized volatility is 35.8% and the stock is currently 12% off its recent high. Can you confirm the grant date and price used to calculate the share count, and whether NVIDIA refreshes equity annually for IC5s — and at what typical cadence and size relative to the initial grant? Why: The bear/base/bull equity scenarios span $214,156 to $509,161 depending on where NVDA trades at vest. Knowing the exact share count locked in at grant, plus the refresh cadence, is the single largest variable in your four-year realized comp. NVIDIA's SBC-to-revenue ratio is 2.7%, which signals disciplined equity issuance — refreshes are real but not automatic. You need the mechanics in writing before you sign.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVIDIA's headcount grew from 29,600 to 42,000 between FY2024 and FY2026 — a 42% increase in two years. Where does this IC5 role sit in that growth wave: is it a net-new headcount position tied to a specific program like Vera or Blackwell, or a backfill? And what is the expected team size and reporting structure at start? Why: A role created to staff a named program (Vera CPU opens a stated $200B TAM per the earnings transcript) carries different scope and visibility than a backfill. Program-attached roles at a company growing revenue per employee at 58.8% YoY tend to have faster promotion cycles. The answer also tells you whether the IC5 band is the ceiling or the floor for this seat.
Evidence confidence: medium
The $60,000 signing bonus — is it structured as a lump sum on day one, or split across the first year? And what is the clawback period and repayment schedule if I leave before the end of that window? Why: At a September 15 start date, a split signing structure could mean you don't see the full $60,000 until mid-2027. More importantly, the clawback terms determine your actual optionality: if the full amount is recoverable for 24 months, your effective year-one exit cost is $60,000 on top of unvested equity. You need the exact repayment schedule before treating the signing as liquid.
Evidence confidence: medium
You joined NVIDIA in September 2026 as an IC5 Senior Silicon Design Engineer on what you believed was a ground-up next-generation architecture program, but by March 2028 the role had collapsed into sustaining engineering on Blackwell derivatives — bug fixes, ECO cycles, and yield-improvement iterations — with no meaningful RTL ownership. The Vera CPU program, which was the stated rationale for your team's headcount expansion, slipped its internal tapeout milestone by two quarters due to TSMC 2nm capacity constraints and a mid-program pivot in the memory subsystem architecture, effectively freezing IC5-level design assignments and funneling all novel work to a small group of IC6 principals who had been on the project since inception. With your Tenstorrent unvested equity already forfeited, the $60,000 signing bonus clawback period expired but the RSU grant — priced at $207.40 — is now worth 40% less than at grant due to a sustained NVDA drawdown triggered by U.S. export control tightening on H20/B20 derivatives to China, and the equity refresh you were promised at the 12-month mark came in at $80,000, not the $150,000+ you modeled, because the company-wide refresh pool was compressed after revenue growth decelerated from 85% to sub-20% YoY as hyperscaler capex cycles normalized.
Evidence confidence: medium
NVIDIA files an 8-K or issues a press release announcing additional U.S. export control restrictions on H20, B20, or any successor accelerator SKU targeting China — monitor SEC EDGAR 8-K filings and BIS Federal Register notices monthly, as each incremental restriction directly compresses the Data…
Evidence confidence: medium
The Vera CPU program misses its publicly telegraphed 'new $200 billion TAM' milestone language in two consecutive earnings calls — if Jensen stops citing Vera by name in the FY2027 Q3 or Q4 transcript, the program has likely slipped internally and your team's design scope will contract toward…
Evidence confidence: medium
Your profile vs this role
Optional user-provided profile context is separated from company diligence so the brief remains clear about what is public data and what is personalized advice.
Senior Silicon Design Engineer focused on measurable outcomes at NVIDIA Corporation
Ties the profile headline to the target role and company context instead of generic scope.
Silicon Design Engineer II with Advanced Micro Devices operating context
Uses the most recent role as credibility while keeping the target role visible.
- Make the first two lines specific to the role you want next.
- Replace broad claims with one quantified outcome from your last two roles.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Advanced Micro Devices, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Qualcomm, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Rewrite one bullet to show business impact at Tenstorrent, not just responsibility.
Hiring teams compare scope and measurable outcomes, not task lists.
Role progression is present, but aggregate peer benchmarks remain k-anonymity gated.
A self-profile signal from your upload — separate from the company composite score.
- →Rewrite the headline to name the target role and operating context.
- →Add one quantified bullet to each of the last three roles.
- →Add evidence for System design if you genuinely have it.
Source: user-uploaded LinkedIn export Positions.csv/Profile.csv/Skills.csv.
Messages.csv is never parsed or stored.
What this brief covers — and what it can’t
Public-company evidence: financial health and trajectory, leadership and board signals, role-level exposure (restructuring filings, WARN notices), the citable market wage band, insider filing patterns, and the negotiation math built from them.
Your future manager and team, day-to-day culture, benefit terms the filings don’t carry (the 401k match formula, PTO, parental leave, healthcare costs), and private-company comparisons. Where a DOL Form 5500 filing matched, the plan-level 401k facts appear above — the day-to-day terms still don’t. That’s what the verification questions in §5 are for — ask them before you sign.
Evidence and methodology
The main brief stays readable; the supporting facts, confidence map, source logs, methodology, and export preview live here for auditability.
Confidence and data gaps
- Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- Sustained insider selling pattern detected.
Sources cross-referenced
Data coverage
This tracks whether available evidence is rendered, held for methodology, gated by confidence, or unavailable.
Canonical verdict and one-number model
Canonical
Rendered in the executive decision screen.
Canonical section claims
Canonical · 48 item(s)
Rendered across the guided chapters as concise evidence cards.
Supporting facts and methodology notes
Canonical · 34 item(s)
Kept in the appendix so the main report stays readable.
Revenue product and geographic segmentation
Fetched · 9 item(s)
Top segments are rendered in Company Quality; full rows remain source data.
Analyst estimates, grades, DCF, targets, earnings
Fetched
Rendered as market-consensus cards instead of raw analyst feeds.
News, press releases, and M&A events
Fetched · 6 item(s)
Material recent events are summarized; raw feed clutter is omitted from the main flow.
Ownership, ETF exposure, financial scores, congressional trades
Fetched
Rendered in Role and Career Risk when it changes the risk read.
career signal layer leadership and board coverage
Computed
Rendered as leadership tape, coverage note, and board count.
O*NET, BEA, WARN, SEC facts, lobbying, USAspending, FEC
Open Data · 4 item(s)
Verified public-data facts are rendered through canonical claims and the evidence appendix.
Evidence behind the dossier: supporting facts, methodology, confidence rationale, filing logs, and exportable rows. Empty sections describe what was reviewed rather than silently disappearing.
Supporting facts(34)
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $39331.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2025
- Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2026): $44062.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q1 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2026): $46743.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q2 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2026): $57006.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q3 FY2026
- Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2026): $68127.0M.Company financial statements · high confidence · Q4 FY2026
- Rule of 40 score: 146.9. Revenue growth 85.2% + FCF margin 61.7%.Computed market metrics · high confidence · 2026-07-17T02:54:40.765Z
- Revenue per employee: $1943K (+58.8% YoY).Computed market metrics · medium confidence · 2026-07-17T02:54:40.765Z
- Insider activity (90d): 7 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 11 equity awards, 5 tax-withholding, 3 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).Form 4 insider activity · medium confidence · 2026-07-17T02:57:15.752Z
- Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $490,584 for the supplied grant.Equity scenario model · high confidence · 2026-07-17T02:54:40.765Z
- 12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 35.8%, max drawdown -20.2%, current drawdown -12%.Historical price model · high confidence · 2026-07-17T02:54:40.765Z
- Suzanne Nora Johnson hire: member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-07-13
- Donald Robertson retirement: VP, Finance.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-05-04
- Persis Drell departure: Board of Directors.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · 2026-01-20
- Ajay K. Puri retirement: Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations.SEC 8-K leadership event · medium confidence · date unknown
- Board: 10 directors (9/10 independent).Proxy statement board record · medium confidence · 2026
- SEC filing: 3 filed 2026-07-15 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-15 00:00:00
- SEC filing: 4 filed 2026-07-06 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-06 00:00:00
- SEC filing: 8-K filed 2026-07-02 00:00:00.SEC filing index · medium confidence · 2026-07-02 00:00:00
- Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The focus on AI and strategic partnerships suggests growth opportunities in emerging technologies.Earnings call transcript · high confidence · 2026-07-17T02:57:15.752Z
- Lobbying exposure: $11.23M reported over 30 filings. Top issues: TRD, CPI, DEF, ENG, LBR.Public lobbying disclosure · medium confidence · 2026-07-17T02:57:15.752Z
Confidence map(8)
- comp_reality · high Section has source-backed facts available.
- leverage · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- leadership_stability · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- three_questions · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- counterfactual · low Counterfactual recommender needs alumni outcomes and peer score generation.
- five_year_forecast · low Career-path aggregates use optional user contributions; this report scores public filings only.
- organizational_diagnosis · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
- red_flags · medium Section has source-backed facts available.
Methodology(10)
- Trajectory Score weights organizational health, leadership stability, strategic coherence, alumni outcomes, promotion velocity, skills marketability, and role-specific risk.
- One Number model varies by report mode: NPV for offer evaluation, EV delta for stay-or-go, trajectory percentile for job seekers, CCVI for career trajectory.
- Public-source leadership signals come from SEC 8-K and DEF 14A records when available.
- Leadership coverage: ready. Leadership=ready, board=ready, transitions=ready. 15 role records, 10 board records, 4 transition records.
- Ticker: NVDA. Company: NVIDIA Corporation.
- Offer inputs: base $235,000, equity $320,000.
- No user-contributed tenure aggregates available.
- Cross-section findings are AI-generated from assembled Tier 2 data and validated for multi-section citation.
- Pre-mortem output was generated by Footnote's structured risk model.
- Insider sentiment aggregate was not available for this ticker.
8-K leadership log(4)
[
{
"new_role": "member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000028/nvda-20260507.htm",
"former_role": null,
"person_name": "Suzanne Nora Johnson",
"source_quote": "appointed Suzanne Nora Johnson as a member of the Board and as a member of the Audit Committee",
"effective_date": "2026-07-13",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "hire"
},
{
"new_role": "VP, Finance",
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000026/nvda-20260424.htm",
"former_role": "VP and Chief Accounting Officer",
"person_name": "Donald Robertson",
"source_quote": "notified the Company of his intention to retire from his role as VP and CAO, effective May 4, 2026",
"effective_date": "2026-05-04",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "retirement"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000003/nvda-20260120.htm",
"former_role": "Board of Directors",
"person_name": "Persis Drell",
"source_quote": "Persis Drell resigned from the Board of Directors, or the Board, of NVIDIA Corporation",
"effective_date": "2026-01-20",
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "departure"
},
{
"new_role": null,
"source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026000060/nvda-20260628.htm",
"former_role": "Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations",
"person_name": "Ajay K. Puri",
"source_quote": "notified the Company of his intention to retire from his role",
"effective_date": null,
"prior_employer": null,
"transition_type": "retirement"
}
]Insider trading log(100)
[
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000131026426000002/0001310264-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "3",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-07-15",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001310264",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "NORA JOHNSON SUZANNE M",
"securitiesOwned": 2496,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-13",
"transactionType": "",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 0,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": ""
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764726000005/0001197647-26-000005-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-07-06",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197647",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "COXE TENCH",
"securitiesOwned": 25171360,
"transactionDate": "2026-07-01",
"transactionType": "G-Gift",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 500000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000009/0001199039-26-000009-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 11544612,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000172529226000004/0001725292-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001725292",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Shah Aarti S.",
"securitiesOwned": 37218,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119765226000007/0001197652-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197652",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "SEAWELL A BROOKE",
"securitiesOwned": 7818,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000176867026000004/0001768670-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001768670",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Neal Stephen C",
"securitiesOwned": 5098,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000128411626000004/0001284116-26-000004-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001284116",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "LORA MELISSA",
"securitiesOwned": 15069,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119765026000002/0001197650-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197650",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "JONES HARVEY C",
"securitiesOwned": 71618,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000121988826000002/0001219888-26-000002-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001219888",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUDSON DAWN E",
"securitiesOwned": 370098,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000181822426000006/0001818224-26-000006-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001818224",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Dabiri John",
"securitiesOwned": 15374,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764726000003/0001197647-26-000003-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-29",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001197647",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "COXE TENCH",
"securitiesOwned": 57378,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-25",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 1211,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000007/0001199039-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 209.6952,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 5772886,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-18",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 319385,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119903926000007/0001199039-26-000007-index.htm",
"price": 210.4372,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director",
"reportingCik": "0001199039",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "STEVENS MARK A",
"securitiesOwned": 5207271,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-18",
"transactionType": "S-Sale",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 565615,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000169684126000008/0001696841-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, General Counsel and Sec",
"reportingCik": "0001696841",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Teter Timothy S.",
"securitiesOwned": 334436,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35742,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000128385426000008/0001283854-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, Operations",
"reportingCik": "0001283854",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Shoquist Debora",
"securitiesOwned": 521755,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 35012,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000158867026000012/0001588670-26-000012-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP & Chief Financial Officer",
"reportingCik": "0001588670",
"securityName": "Common",
"reportingName": "Kress Colette",
"securitiesOwned": 840641,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 40746,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000134784226000013/0001347842-26-000013-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: EVP, Worldwide Field Ops",
"reportingCik": "0001347842",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "Puri Ajay K",
"securitiesOwned": 600321,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 36927,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764926000010/0001197649-26-000010-index.htm",
"price": 207.41,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-23",
"typeOfOwner": "director, officer: President and CEO",
"reportingCik": "0001197649",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUANG JEN HSUN",
"securitiesOwned": 70146252,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-17",
"transactionType": "F-InKind",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 45723,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000119764926000008/0001197649-26-000008-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-18",
"typeOfOwner": "director, officer: President and CEO",
"reportingCik": "0001197649",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "HUANG JEN HSUN",
"securitiesOwned": 468131547,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-16",
"transactionType": "G-Gift",
"directOrIndirect": "I",
"securitiesTransacted": 400000,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "D"
},
{
"url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000124382126000005/0001243821-26-000005-index.htm",
"price": 0,
"symbol": "NVDA",
"formType": "4",
"companyCik": "0001045810",
"filingDate": "2026-06-10",
"typeOfOwner": "officer: Principal Accounting Officer",
"reportingCik": "0001243821",
"securityName": "Common Stock",
"reportingName": "GAWEL SCOTT",
"securitiesOwned": 59509,
"transactionDate": "2026-06-08",
"transactionType": "A-Award",
"directOrIndirect": "D",
"securitiesTransacted": 13866,
"acquisitionOrDisposition": "A"
}
]Transcript pull(6)
[
{
"period": "FY2027 Q1",
"source": "earnings_extraction",
"excerpt": "Capital allocation towards R&D and strategic investments · Expanding AI infrastructure and market share · Growing share in inference and AI models · Developing new CPU market with Vera"
},
{
"kind": "risk",
"label": "Supply Chain Challenges",
"source": "transcript_signals",
"excerpt": "While we are not immune to supply challenges, we remain confident."
},
{
"kind": "risk",
"label": "China Market Uncertainty",
"source": "transcript_signals",
"excerpt": "We are uncertain whether any imports will be allowed into the country."
},
{
"kind": "investment",
"label": "R&D",
"source": "transcript_signals",
"excerpt": "We will make investments necessary to deliver the industry's lowest cost per token."
},
{
"kind": "investment",
"label": "AI Cloud Solutions",
"source": "transcript_signals",
"excerpt": "We are in every hyperscale cloud."
},
{
"kind": "investment",
"label": "Edge Computing",
"source": "transcript_signals",
"excerpt": "NVIDIA CUDA extends all the way to the edge."
}
]Glossary(4)
- 8-K
- SEC current report used for material company events, including executive appointments and departures.
- DEF 14A
- Definitive proxy statement containing board, governance, and executive disclosure.
- Trajectory Score
- Footnote's 0-100 estimate of career value and risk for a role/company decision.
- K-anonymity
- Privacy threshold that suppresses aggregate user-contributed metrics until enough contributors exist.
Export preview
{
"csv_rows": [
{
"id": "fact_001",
"claim": "Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2025): $39331.0M.",
"value": 39331000000,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "fmp_financials"
},
{
"id": "fact_002",
"claim": "Quarterly revenue (Q1 FY2026): $44062.0M.",
"value": 44062000000,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "fmp_financials"
},
{
"id": "fact_003",
"claim": "Quarterly revenue (Q2 FY2026): $46743.0M.",
"value": 46743000000,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "fmp_financials"
},
{
"id": "fact_004",
"claim": "Quarterly revenue (Q3 FY2026): $57006.0M.",
"value": 57006000000,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "fmp_financials"
},
{
"id": "fact_005",
"claim": "Quarterly revenue (Q4 FY2026): $68127.0M.",
"value": 68127000000,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "fmp_financials"
},
{
"id": "fact_006",
"claim": "Rule of 40 score: 146.9. Revenue growth 85.2% + FCF margin 61.7%.",
"value": 146.9,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "computed market data"
},
{
"id": "fact_007",
"claim": "Revenue per employee: $1943K (+58.8% YoY).",
"value": 1943214,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "computed market data"
},
{
"id": "fact_008",
"claim": "Insider activity (90d): 7 open-market sells, 0 open-market buys, sell ratio 100%. Excluded as non-discretionary: 11 equity awards, 5 tax-withholding, 3 gifts. Pattern: sustained_selling. Signal: negative (high).",
"value": 1,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_insider_trading"
},
{
"id": "fact_009",
"claim": "Equity scenario base case: analyst median implies $490,584 for the supplied grant.",
"value": 490584,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "derived_equity_scenario"
},
{
"id": "fact_010",
"claim": "12-month stock risk: annualized volatility 35.8%, max drawdown -20.2%, current drawdown -12%.",
"value": -20.2,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "derived_price_history"
},
{
"id": "fact_011",
"claim": "Suzanne Nora Johnson hire: member of the Board and member of the Audit Committee.",
"value": "Suzanne Nora Johnson: hire",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "graph_8k_502"
},
{
"id": "fact_012",
"claim": "Donald Robertson retirement: VP, Finance.",
"value": "Donald Robertson: retirement",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "graph_8k_502"
},
{
"id": "fact_013",
"claim": "Persis Drell departure: Board of Directors.",
"value": "Persis Drell: departure",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "graph_8k_502"
},
{
"id": "fact_014",
"claim": "Ajay K. Puri retirement: Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations.",
"value": "Ajay K. Puri: retirement",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "graph_8k_502"
},
{
"id": "fact_015",
"claim": "Board: 10 directors (9/10 independent).",
"value": 10,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "graph_def14a_board"
},
{
"id": "fact_016",
"claim": "SEC filing: 3 filed 2026-07-15 00:00:00.",
"value": "3",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_sec_filings"
},
{
"id": "fact_017",
"claim": "SEC filing: 4 filed 2026-07-06 00:00:00.",
"value": "4",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_sec_filings"
},
{
"id": "fact_018",
"claim": "SEC filing: 8-K filed 2026-07-02 00:00:00.",
"value": "8-K",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_sec_filings"
},
{
"id": "signal_coherence_NVDA",
"claim": "Strategic coherence: 75/100 (Strong). The focus on AI and strategic partnerships suggests growth opportunities in emerging technologies.",
"value": 75,
"confidence": "high",
"source": "earnings_transcript_extraction"
},
{
"id": "influence_lobbying_NVDA",
"claim": "Lobbying exposure: $11.23M reported over 30 filings. Top issues: TRD, CPI, DEF, ENG, LBR.",
"value": 11230000,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "lda_sopr"
},
{
"id": "signal_insider_sentiment_97f474c3_2b95_4019_945b_34f7be13c7cd_insider",
"claim": "Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).",
"value": 56,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_insider_trading"
},
{
"id": "signal_strategic_coherence_97f474c3_2b95_4019_945b_34f7be13c7cd_transcript_signals",
"claim": "Transcript signals (FY2027 Q1): AI Infrastructure Expansion; Capital Allocation",
"value": "high",
"confidence": "high",
"source": "earnings_transcript_extraction"
},
{
"id": "signal_realtime_strategic_context_97f474c3_2b95_4019_945b_34f7be13c7cd",
"claim": "Realtime strategic context was materialized for canonical report grounding.",
"value": "**No notable developments** matching the requested categories (layoffs/hiring freezes/workforce changes, C-suite leadership departures, major customer wins/losses, restructuring, or earnings misses/guidance cuts) were reported for NVIDIA (NVDA) in the last 60 days.\n\n- NVIDIA’s most recent earnings release (fiscal Q2 2025, ended July 28) occurred on August 28, 2024; results beat consensus estimates with no guidance cuts. The next earnings release is scheduled for November 2024.\n- No announcements",
"confidence": "low",
"source": "realtime_signals"
},
{
"id": "signal_strategic_coherence_97f474c3_2b95_4019_945b_34f7be13c7cd",
"claim": "Earnings transcript summary was materialized for strategic coherence.",
"value": "{\"strategic_priorities\":[{\"priority\":\"Capital allocation towards R&D and strategic investments\",\"evidence_quote\":\"First, to reiterate, our intention is to prioritize R&D and strategic investment. Both will enable us to cultivate our ecosystem, drive market growth, and strengthen our market position.\"},{\"priority\":\"Expanding AI infrastructure and market share\",\"evidence_quote\":\"Demand for AI infrastructure continues to expand at an unprecedented pace. The build out of AI factories is accelerating",
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "earnings_transcript_summary"
},
{
"id": "signal_insider_sentiment_cce479ec_37c8_4b84_8123_19426248c9ea_insider",
"claim": "Insider transaction mix was materialized for leadership stability (raw licensed market data; classifier pending).",
"value": 57,
"confidence": "medium",
"source": "fmp_insider_trading"
}
],
"json_keys": [
"facts",
"sections"
]
}Purchase your report to unlock full details
Live SEC filings, peer comp, scripts, provenance, and canonical synthesis — built for your company and offer.
Get your brief — $199See all four brief tiers